Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: C&S No. 9

April 07, 2004 08:31AM
Steve,
The locomotive has been sitting outside for over 50 years, first in South Dakota, now in Colorado.
The locomotive appliances were torched off (not removed, TORCHED) by the previous caretaker when it became obvious that the locomotive was going to move from Hill City to Georgetown. From what I understand, his includes the Bell Hanger, Boiler Checks, Injector and Throttle Rod.
The Tender (as was posted earlier) is rotton, having never been properly drained after 50 years of rain, snow and various precipitation carrying weather patterns. I would be afraid to pop the journal box lids on the tender trucks for fear of seeing all of that wonderfully lathed babbett and brass in little flakes at the bottom of the box.
The Lagging is still Asbestos. Personally, I feel that the asbestos abatement paranoia displayed by the CHS is WAY, WAY overblown. The Asbestos is easily removed by wetting it and packing it in 55 gal. drums. The fact of the matter is that the longer that it remains, it continues to trap water beneath it, contributing to the further deterioration of the boiler. This effect was negated by locomotives in service through the heat of the boiler itself and the evaporation that took place from that heat. No. 9 hasn't been officially fired up since 1939.
Then there is the frame. I don't know if it's cracked or not, but with the snow that the 9 had to buck when assigned to the Leadville Passenger train (that plow was on there for a reason), I wouldn't doubt that hairline cracks have deteriorated to major gaping chasms. I doubt that a true inspection has been done of the Hub liners, Grease Cellars and wheel bearings on the drivers.
It is highly unlikely that the side rods been Magnafluxed or had the rod caps pulled so that the rod bearings could be inspected. Along with this, the Stephenson link has to be checked for bearing wear on the axle eccentrics, along with the slop in the bearing blocks as they travel forward to reverse.
The cab is rotted and barely there. It was that way in South Dakota in the '60's, new paint not withstanding. It is certainly in no shape for daily use.
All in all, it would be easier and cheaper to jack up the dome bases and covers, roll out the wheels and scrap and rebuild the rest. (I'd say "jack up the whistle" but it's gone, too.)
Rick
Subject Author Posted

Georgetown Loop RFI *LINK*

Natasha Bettis April 03, 2004 06:33PM

Re: Georgetown Loop RFI

Dale W. Brown April 03, 2004 10:33PM

Correction on Georgetown Loop RFI

Dale W. Brown April 03, 2004 10:36PM

Re: Georgetown Loop RFI

Steve Stockham April 04, 2004 07:25AM

Re: Georgetown Loop RFI

M. Peterson April 04, 2004 08:08AM

Re: Georgetown Loop RFI

Douglas vV April 04, 2004 08:50AM

Re: Georgetown Loop RFI

Don Richter April 04, 2004 10:40AM

C&S #9

Douglas vV April 04, 2004 12:32PM

Re: C&S #9

Dave S. April 04, 2004 01:07PM

Re: Georgetown Loop RFI

rick b April 04, 2004 10:39AM

Re: Georgetown Loop RFI

Keevan Burnside April 04, 2004 12:15PM

Re: Georgetown Loop RFI

Jason Midyette April 04, 2004 01:42PM

Re: Georgetown Loop RFI

Michael Allen April 04, 2004 01:51PM

Re: Georgetown Loop RFI

M. Peterson April 04, 2004 02:38PM

Re: Georgetown Loop RFI

Rick Steele April 04, 2004 03:04PM

Re: Georgetown Loop RFI

Dale W. Brown April 04, 2004 03:08PM

Trying To Kill The Georgetown Loop *PIC*

roger hogan April 04, 2004 03:13PM

Re: Trying To Kill The Georgetown Loop

Mike April 04, 2004 04:26PM

Re: Trying To Kill The Georgetown Loop *LINK*

Don C. April 04, 2004 04:27PM

Re: Trying To Kill The Georgetown Loop

Herb Kelsey April 06, 2004 04:37PM

Maybe, maybe not.

Don Richter April 04, 2004 04:55PM

The CHS does not understand enough about railraods

Douglas vV April 04, 2004 05:34PM

Re: Georgetown Loop RFI

Phil Reader April 04, 2004 04:05PM

Re: Georgetown Loop RFI

Steve Stockham April 04, 2004 11:26PM

Destroying Historic Heritage

Dick April 05, 2004 06:33PM

Re: Destroying Historic Heritage

South Park April 05, 2004 07:39PM

Re: Destroying Historic Heritage

Rick Steele April 06, 2004 07:45AM

Re: Destroying Historic Heritage

Steve Stockham April 05, 2004 07:42PM

Simple explanation

Rail Geek April 06, 2004 01:39PM

Re: Simple explanation

El Nehi April 06, 2004 04:47PM

Simple explanation: Thanks

Don Richter April 06, 2004 06:30PM

Re: Simple explanation: Thanks

Tim Schreiner April 06, 2004 06:55PM

Re: Simple explanation: Thanks

El Nehi April 06, 2004 08:57PM

Re: Simple explanation: Thanks

Steve Stockham April 06, 2004 08:52PM

Re: C&S No. 9

Rick Steele April 07, 2004 08:31AM

Re: Simple explanation: Thanks

Ted Miles April 07, 2004 10:32AM

The ball is still in play

El Coke April 06, 2004 09:53PM

Re: Simple explanation

Dick April 07, 2004 01:02PM

Re: Destroying Historic Heritage

Nephrite April 07, 2004 01:33AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.