Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Maintenance

February 04, 2004 05:45AM
The bottom line is the bottom line.
If steam railroading to carry tourists was really profitable, the railroads would still be doing it. Rio Grande didn't sell the Silverton branch because it was a profit center. The railroads didn't dieselize on a whim.
Anybody who thinks they can make a bundle by operating a steam railroad better check what was in their cereal that morning.
People who operate historic steam railroads must be prepared for long hours, maximum liability exposure, huge expenses and countless other miserable situations.
It seems we have three types of operators. The ones trying to do it right, the ones still trying to find the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, and the ones in between. Those trying to do it right will probably make it, and my hat is off to them, as they have accepted what they are up against and are dedicated to the proposition that historical preservation is worth the cost. Those looking for the pot-o'-gold would do us all a favor by getting out of the business. The ones in the middle need to make up their minds. CATS is a classic example of the middle where the owner and operator don't appear to be on the same page. Seems like their has been no lack of dedication on the part of the operators, save one, but the owners need to decide whether they are going to fish or cut bait.
Subject Author Posted

C&TS on front page of Denver Post *NM* *LINK*

Glen Brewer January 27, 2004 06:49AM

Re: C&TS on front page of Denver Post

Rich Muth January 27, 2004 07:12AM

Re: C&TS on front page of Denver Post

Les Clark January 27, 2004 08:55AM

Several comments about this great article

Brian Shoup January 27, 2004 02:22PM

Thanks Mr. Shoup

roger hogan January 27, 2004 02:56PM

Re: Several comments about this great article

Dale Brown January 27, 2004 08:59PM

Yo, Padre!

Crayuft January 28, 2004 05:57AM

I take strong exception to your comments.

El Coke January 28, 2004 02:10PM

Yes, but.....

John West January 28, 2004 03:17PM

Re: Yes, but.....what don't you understand?

Chris Callaway January 28, 2004 08:57PM

Maintenance

John Bush January 29, 2004 08:03AM

The usual photographic evidence... *LINK* *PIC*

John West January 29, 2004 01:18PM

Re: thanks, but . . . *PIC*

Crayuft January 29, 2004 03:41PM

Part of the quote was...

El Coke January 31, 2004 08:04PM

not exactly

John Craft February 01, 2004 01:06PM

The other offensive statement...but...

El RC February 01, 2004 09:19PM

I also say "not exactly"

El Coke February 01, 2004 10:49PM

Re: I also say "not exactly"

John Craft February 02, 2004 05:25AM

Back channel me , then .

El Coke February 02, 2004 06:04PM

Re: Back channel me , then .

Les Clark February 03, 2004 01:01PM

Your answer is back channeled

El Coke February 03, 2004 02:24PM

Re: The usual photographic evidence...

Earl January 31, 2004 05:20PM

Re: Maintenance

chris ahrens January 30, 2004 04:03PM

Re: Maintenance

John Bush January 31, 2004 06:49AM

A hole in the water

Don Richter January 31, 2004 08:11AM

Re: Maintenance

chris ahrens January 31, 2004 09:01AM

Bid Proposals by the WP &Y

Robby Peartree January 31, 2004 09:17PM

Re: Bid Proposals by the WP &Y

John Bush February 01, 2004 09:01AM

Re: Bid Proposals by the WP &Y

John Cole February 01, 2004 11:55AM

Re: Maintenance

Dick Cowles February 03, 2004 04:58PM

Re: Maintenance

Linn W. Moedinger February 04, 2004 05:45AM

Not a way to get rich

Claude Wiatrowski February 05, 2004 09:09AM

Re: Not a way to get rich

WP&Ymike February 05, 2004 03:13PM

How to make a million dollars

RBrinton February 05, 2004 04:00PM

Re: How to make a million dollars

El Skonk February 05, 2004 05:38PM

Re: How to make a million dollars

Hoss - The Wideload February 05, 2004 08:39PM

Re: How to make a million dollars

WP&Ymike February 06, 2004 04:52AM

Really, millions wIth Steam Railroad

steve thompson February 06, 2004 08:00AM

Re: Really, millions wIth Steam Railroad

Steve Singer February 06, 2004 08:09AM

Ask and you might receive

Robby Peartree February 05, 2004 10:20AM

Here's the Correct Link: *LINK*

Mike Trent January 30, 2004 09:04PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.