Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Maintenance

January 31, 2004 09:01AM
John,
My apologies. I should have added the following.
What an operation such as this requires, is reasonable annual support to cover the major non- operating expenses. These amounts should go toward the areas that cannot be covered by the gate receipts. Heard this before?
Major locomotive repairs, track rehab and to a lesser extent but no less important are car repairs and physical plant, all of which require a programing for the long haul, a commited operator and sufficient funding to do the job.
The politians may be afraid to open deeper the state coffers for fear of opening a bottomless money pit. But reasonable funding over the long haul that will support a long term maintenance program will be cheaper than big bucks and lots of flack and just maybe, bad PR when an incident ocures.
Is it that both states have no real concept of what this work amounts to? Is it also that there has been no real appreciation (support) for those groups (and volunteers) that in the past have struggled to meet payroll and perform repairs, in part, on passenger receipts alone? And still kept the trains rolling safely, which unless I've missed the point, is the benefit of having the tourist dollar coming into each state and local communities.
The DSNG (RR operated or private) is one reason DGO has grown and prospered thru the years. The CATS should not be gauged to the same scale as DSNG. On the other hand, the local Chamber of Commerce in ALA & the merchants in Anto. & Chama certainly appreciate the tourist dollar brought in because of the railroad.
One thing, however, in this climate of reduction in Fed moneys and the states having their financial difficulites, it becomes more important
that every dollar requested and spent be well planned and accounted for.
One could make the arguement that if sufficient funding had been there in the past, we wouldn't be in the present condition. A valid observation as hind sight always provides.
Is it time to start anew? Get the major players together to review the past, discuss the present, plan for the future and provide the support necessary to have this a positive attraction and a feather in the caps of both states (including the polititans who authorize the $$$). All nice words.
The days of hauling freight are over. Times change. If the passenger business is to survive, you may have to continue to adapt and that includes everyone. This is not to say all involved thru the years haven't given their all, and perhaps, some have taken more than they should. Regardless, CATS is a unique operation, it offers something different than DGO. Both have their place.
All involved should take pride in keeping this part of history available to the public. The whole of southern Colorado and northern New Mexico has such a mystique about it! What a variety! From plains to high mountains and the railroad had to overcome all of that. Now you have to overcome an additional problems.
All this has been said before and in much better lingo than this writer.
And to think, I only was going add a paragraph or two! Damn! Sorry again, John
Chris
Subject Author Posted

C&TS on front page of Denver Post *NM* *LINK*

Glen Brewer January 27, 2004 06:49AM

Re: C&TS on front page of Denver Post

Rich Muth January 27, 2004 07:12AM

Re: C&TS on front page of Denver Post

Les Clark January 27, 2004 08:55AM

Several comments about this great article

Brian Shoup January 27, 2004 02:22PM

Thanks Mr. Shoup

roger hogan January 27, 2004 02:56PM

Re: Several comments about this great article

Dale Brown January 27, 2004 08:59PM

Yo, Padre!

Crayuft January 28, 2004 05:57AM

I take strong exception to your comments.

El Coke January 28, 2004 02:10PM

Yes, but.....

John West January 28, 2004 03:17PM

Re: Yes, but.....what don't you understand?

Chris Callaway January 28, 2004 08:57PM

Maintenance

John Bush January 29, 2004 08:03AM

The usual photographic evidence... *LINK* *PIC*

John West January 29, 2004 01:18PM

Re: thanks, but . . . *PIC*

Crayuft January 29, 2004 03:41PM

Part of the quote was...

El Coke January 31, 2004 08:04PM

not exactly

John Craft February 01, 2004 01:06PM

The other offensive statement...but...

El RC February 01, 2004 09:19PM

I also say "not exactly"

El Coke February 01, 2004 10:49PM

Re: I also say "not exactly"

John Craft February 02, 2004 05:25AM

Back channel me , then .

El Coke February 02, 2004 06:04PM

Re: Back channel me , then .

Les Clark February 03, 2004 01:01PM

Your answer is back channeled

El Coke February 03, 2004 02:24PM

Re: The usual photographic evidence...

Earl January 31, 2004 05:20PM

Re: Maintenance

chris ahrens January 30, 2004 04:03PM

Re: Maintenance

John Bush January 31, 2004 06:49AM

A hole in the water

Don Richter January 31, 2004 08:11AM

Re: Maintenance

chris ahrens January 31, 2004 09:01AM

Bid Proposals by the WP &Y

Robby Peartree January 31, 2004 09:17PM

Re: Bid Proposals by the WP &Y

John Bush February 01, 2004 09:01AM

Re: Bid Proposals by the WP &Y

John Cole February 01, 2004 11:55AM

Re: Maintenance

Dick Cowles February 03, 2004 04:58PM

Re: Maintenance

Linn W. Moedinger February 04, 2004 05:45AM

Not a way to get rich

Claude Wiatrowski February 05, 2004 09:09AM

Re: Not a way to get rich

WP&Ymike February 05, 2004 03:13PM

How to make a million dollars

RBrinton February 05, 2004 04:00PM

Re: How to make a million dollars

El Skonk February 05, 2004 05:38PM

Re: How to make a million dollars

Hoss - The Wideload February 05, 2004 08:39PM

Re: How to make a million dollars

WP&Ymike February 06, 2004 04:52AM

Really, millions wIth Steam Railroad

steve thompson February 06, 2004 08:00AM

Re: Really, millions wIth Steam Railroad

Steve Singer February 06, 2004 08:09AM

Ask and you might receive

Robby Peartree February 05, 2004 10:20AM

Here's the Correct Link: *LINK*

Mike Trent January 30, 2004 09:04PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.