Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

September 22, 2019 08:42AM avatar
drgwk37 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> evankamp Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Where is another k37 tender for them to pick up
> > for 498
>
>
> They would have to build one, which considering
> what they just did with 493's tender would be a
> stretch for the D&SNG or C&TS shops to do if they
> had to do it. The cisterns on all of the
> operational K's are replicas.
>
> William
> aka drgwk37


There is three "replica" tender tanks on the C&TS - 463, 497 and 488(?). Those on 484, 487 & 489 are original Baldwin tanks.
Subject Author Posted

Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

Greg Scholl September 20, 2019 10:51AM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

evankamp September 20, 2019 11:01AM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

Mike Stillwell September 20, 2019 11:15AM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

evankamp September 20, 2019 11:17AM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

Mike Stillwell September 20, 2019 11:20AM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

drgwk37 September 20, 2019 11:27AM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

evankamp September 20, 2019 11:44AM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

drgwk37 September 20, 2019 11:48AM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

evankamp September 20, 2019 11:53AM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

Joe Weigman September 20, 2019 12:03PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

cdaspit September 20, 2019 02:36PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483 Attachments

Jerry474 September 20, 2019 03:03PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

Greg Scholl September 20, 2019 03:09PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483 Attachments

Joe Weigman September 22, 2019 12:04PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

drgwk37 September 22, 2019 04:24PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

Kevin Cook November 12, 2019 02:26PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

Will Gant September 25, 2019 09:22AM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

HRB November 12, 2019 02:10PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

Sean Jackson November 12, 2019 05:17PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

jonaths November 12, 2019 06:19PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

Carl T. Henderson November 12, 2019 09:07PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

Dirk Ramsey November 12, 2019 09:11PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

Joe Weigman November 13, 2019 01:33PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

Earl September 22, 2019 08:42AM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

drgwk37 September 22, 2019 04:22PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

Rob483 September 24, 2019 08:08PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

Ryan Morris September 24, 2019 08:32PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483 Attachments

Jerry474 September 20, 2019 12:31PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

Rick Steele September 20, 2019 01:07PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

Greg Scholl September 20, 2019 01:13PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

Jerry474 September 20, 2019 01:17PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

guymonmd September 20, 2019 01:19PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

evankamp September 20, 2019 01:24PM

Re: Revisiting the trade for 478 for 483

cdaspit September 20, 2019 02:42PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login