Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: 493, then which is next? 498 possible?

March 25, 2019 04:47PM
guymonmd Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It was my understanding that 493 was being
> restored and converted for oil burning for use in
> times of high fire danger, and they would use the
> the coal-burners at other times.
> They are also purchasing 2 new diesel loco's for
> use during times if high fire danger.
> I'd like to see another k-37 restored and used,
> but I think for operations during lower fire
> danger they have all the power they need.
> I don't know how much the diesels will be able to
> pull, and many riders like myself would much
> rather ride behind a steam locomotive than a
> diesel, and with the 493 and 2 diesels they might
> be limited to 2 trains a day during high fire
> danger. They might like to have another oil
> burning steamer they can use, but as to if they
> will convert a k-36 to oil burning during the next
> scheduled overhaul or restore another k-37, only
> the D&S can say. We'll just have to wait and
> see.
>
> I would not be surprised if over the next 10-15
> years if they convert all their k-36's to oil
> burning if the 493 works out for them.

The reason the 493 restoration started is because the D&SNG needed another large engine to keep up with the demand. As pointed out the rebuild was accelerated due to the 416 fire when 493 was then deemed necessary to make her an oil burner. In order for the D&SNG to do complete and major overhauls like they did on the 476 another large loco was needed in the rotation. 493 will be used as much as any operating loco today as it is part of the normal operating plan moving forward. This was a crucial step to ensuring the shop crews had time to really take the time needed for a full teardown and rebuild of every operating locomotive. I heard 486 is next in line for the major rebuild so we wont see or hear her for at least 18 months from the completion of 493.

William
aka drgwk37
Subject Author Posted

493, then which is next? 498 possible?

AZ Railfan March 25, 2019 10:45AM

Re: 493, then which is next? 498 possible?

Peyton Smith March 25, 2019 12:33PM

Re: 493, then which is next? 498 possible?

Will Gant March 25, 2019 03:45PM

Re: 493, then which is next? 498 possible?

Wayne Hoskin March 25, 2019 04:51PM

Re: 493, then which is next? 498 possible?

Sharrod March 25, 2019 05:07PM

Re: 493 with a tender like 18's? . . . thumbs downthumbs down

Russo Loco March 25, 2019 05:17PM

Re: 493, then which is next? 498 possible?

Bill Scobie March 25, 2019 05:14PM

Re: 493, then which is next? 498 possible?

guymonmd March 25, 2019 03:52PM

Re: 493, then which is next? 498 possible?

Kelly Anderson March 25, 2019 04:13PM

Re: 493, then which is next? 498 possible?

drgwk37 March 25, 2019 04:47PM

Re: 493, then which is next? 498 possible?

AZ Railfan March 25, 2019 05:15PM

Re: 493, then which is next? 498 possible?

Will Gant March 25, 2019 06:07PM

Re: 493, then which is next? 498 possible?

drgwk37 March 25, 2019 04:52PM

Re: 493, then which is next? 498 possible?

Sharrod March 25, 2019 05:08PM

Re: 493, then which is next? 498 possible?

Mark Huber March 25, 2019 07:19PM

Re: 493, then which is next? 498 possible?

AZ Railfan March 26, 2019 10:07AM

Re: 493, then which is next? 498 possible?

michael March 25, 2019 05:41PM

Re: 493, then which is next? 498 possible?

rehunn March 25, 2019 07:01PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login