Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Baldwin 2-8-0 SVRy 10, ex D&RG 74, ex RGW

July 01, 2007 11:00AM
Let's go back to the original question. D&RG 74 was not a C-16, but a D&RG Class 56. To begin with, the C-16 classification did not exist on the D&RG, it was developed in 1924 by the D&RGW.

The D&RG classified locomotives based on weight, with Class 56 being a 56,000 pound engine, with nominal tractive effort of 13,000 pounds. Class 60 was a 60,000 pound engine, with a nominal tractive effort shown on some early documents of around 15,000 pounds. Both groups were narrow gauge 2-8-0s. The Class 56 2-8-0s were smaller both in weight and tractive effort than the locomotives which became D&RGW class C-16. The D&RGW calculated the tractive effort for the 30 ton C-16's as 16,000 pounds.

Good luck with the SV modeling. Iron horse trading sure gets complicated, doesn't it?

Charlie
-30-
Subject Author Posted

Baldwin 2-8-0 SVRy 10, ex D&RG 74, ex RGW

DaveM June 18, 2007 08:50AM

Re: Baldwin 2-8-0 SVRy 10, ex D&RG 74, ex RGW

Brian Norden June 18, 2007 09:04PM

Re: Baldwin 2-8-0 SVRy 10, ex D&RG 74, ex RGW

J.B.Bane June 19, 2007 09:35AM

Re: Baldwin 2-8-0 SVRy 10, ex D&RG 74, ex RGW

J.B.Bane June 20, 2007 08:09PM

Re: Baldwin 2-8-0 SVRy 10, ex D&RG 74, ex RGW

Brian Norden June 20, 2007 08:57PM

Re: Baldwin 2-8-0 SVRy 10, ex D&RG 74, ex RGW

dan June 19, 2007 08:45PM

Re: Baldwin 2-8-0 SVRy 10, ex D&RG 74, ex RGW

DaveM July 01, 2007 10:33AM

Re: Baldwin 2-8-0 SVRy 10, ex D&RG 74, ex RGW

Charlie Mutschler July 01, 2007 11:00AM

Re: new info on SVRy #10?

DaveM July 13, 2007 03:49PM

Re: new info on SVRy #10?

Ed Stabler July 13, 2007 04:03PM

Re: new info on SVRy #10?

J.B.Bane July 13, 2007 07:48PM

Re: new info on SVRy #10?

Brian Norden July 13, 2007 10:06PM

Re: new info on SVRy #10?

Brian Norden July 15, 2007 01:28AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login