Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Real boiler pressure and its impact on t.e. and operations

June 17, 2017 03:20PM
kcsivils Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hopefully I can explain my question in a clear
> enough manner someone can answer it.
>
> Unless you want to operate a locomotive, let's say
> a K-36 for this example, at it's maximum boiler
> pressure all the time (which would probably mean
> the safety valve would be popping on a far too
> regular basis), what is a typical "real" operating
> boiler pressure and what impact does it have on
> tractive effort?
>
> For example, I would imagine working up the 4%
> grade to Cumbress would reduce boiler pressure a
> good bit unless the fireman really works hard and
> the injectors don't cause any problems.
>
> What would a 10 lb. drop in boiler pressure do to
> a K-36's tractive effort?
>
> What would a 20 lb. drop in boiler pressure do to
> a K-36's tractive effort?
>
> What would a realistic average boiler pressure be
> on the run from Chama to Cumbress? Were allowances
> made for this in determining the tonnage for a run
> up the hill?

To figure tractive effort you multiply a constant (typically .85 boiler pressure in US use*) times the square of the cylinder diameter, times the stroke, then divide by the driver diameter. Reducing boiler pressure, and hence tractive effort, might not always correlate to a reduction in actual pulling ability. Such is the case when pulling ability is limited by available adhesion rather than by tractive effort. In some cases excessively slippery locomotives can be made more sure-footed with no loss of pulling ability with a reduction in working pressure. In cases where adhesion is sufficient, lowering pressure results in a loss of maximum pulling ability; reduce it too much and your train stalls. The main advantage of the 2-8-2 type over the traditional 2-8-0 was that the mikado type was more able to keep working hard (or running fast) while maintaining boiler pressure thanks to the type's increased heating surface and grate area relative to the consolidation. Tonnage ratings in normal service on most any railroad were normally kept a bit conservative to allow for contingency factors like bad fuel or wet/slippery rail.

*This constant is supposed to represent the actual pressure of the steam once it finally reaches the cylinders, and really it represents what was regarded as typical during the mid/late 19th century. Other countries used different values, and at any rate the real pressure within the cylinder would've been different from one locomotive to the next. The constant remains a constant in calculation mostly for convenience and the sake of comparison.
Subject Author Posted

Real boiler pressure and its impact on t.e. and operations

kcsivils June 17, 2017 01:00PM

Re: Real boiler pressure and its impact on t.e. and operations

Mark Huber June 17, 2017 01:27PM

Re: Real boiler pressure and its impact on t.e. and operations

Tom Moungovan June 17, 2017 02:50PM

Re: Real boiler pressure and its impact on t.e. and operations

James June 17, 2017 03:20PM

Re: Real boiler pressure and its impact on t.e. and operations

rehunn June 17, 2017 04:28PM

Re: Real boiler pressure and its impact on t.e. and operations

Kelly Anderson June 17, 2017 09:22PM

Re: Real boiler pressure and its impact on t.e. and operations

Earl June 18, 2017 08:01AM

Re: Real boiler pressure and its impact on t.e. and operations

Glenn Butcher June 18, 2017 10:42AM

Re: Real boiler pressure and its impact on t.e. and operations

DAN58590 June 22, 2017 05:29PM

Re: Real boiler pressure and its impact on t.e. and operations

Casey Akin June 18, 2017 08:17PM

Re: Real boiler pressure and its impact on t.e. and operations

Russ489 June 18, 2017 09:36PM

Re: Real boiler pressure and its impact on t.e. and operations

Earl June 18, 2017 08:33AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login