ROW Explorer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I found a shot from May 26, 1990 which shows that
> a sign was still present on the north end at that
> time and had not been repainted to the current
> color. The upper sign is not present in this 1990
> shot. I also found a very distant shot of the
> south end from 1989 and to me it looks like there
> is no sign present. I can see the horizontal brace
> that would have been hidden by the sign in the 78
> shot and there doesn't appear to be a sign under
> the brace either.
>
> May 26, 1990 north end:
> [attachment 40551 OilDockNorth_26May1990.jpg]
Dave,
Thanks for posting this latest photo. I've pointed it out to Jim Gross, and we feel It and other photos posted here show that the "danger" signs on both ends of the facility historically had white lettering on red backgrounds. We're ordering a flat red paint for the "new" signs that we are shooting to fabricate for installation in late June, during either C or D work sessions. Some of that work is already underway thanks to help we've gotten from folks who have posed here and Doug Frederick who has done work on the ground in Chama. Thanks again, folks.
Paul