Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Locos on the RGS

May 25, 2016 10:06AM
Herb Kelsey Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------








Note: I have found that using dots, instead of spaces, between entries in tables I post makes the software keep things more or less in line
Now for a few quibbles...



> 2nd 1 56 Class 1906
> 1913 D&RG 56/RGS 35/BC&F 1
There is some evidence that this engine never made it to RGS before it was sold to BC&F. All of the class 56 engines from the RGW went first to Burnham for shopping then on to the RGS and #35 apparently hadn't been completed yet when the Silver Panic and the 1st recievership went down in '93.
>




























> 18 60 Class
> 1891 1916 D&RG 258
> 19 60 Class
> 1891 1916 D&RG 259




> 21 60 Class
> 1891 1916 D&RG 261
>
18, 19 & 21 were never used(AFAIK) after they went outlaw at the start of 1917 but they remained on the property, along with 2nd #1, untill the mid-20's (1924 by some sources)







> 26 - Number never assigned
I have seen, somewhere, that RGS was going to use #26 on an addtional ex-RGW engine but that the deal fell through. I can't remember where I saw this or what engine it was going to be.





















> Quite a stable of power but many were out very
> early. The little 56 class 2-8-0's were too small
Actually, records indicate that the RGS used the Class 56 engines heavily in the late 1890's, they had all just been heavily refurbished at Burnham. Class 56 was only a little lighter than Class 60 but, with main line standard gague after 1890 the D&RG system had a surplus of engines with most of the smaller ones going away, a process added to by the arrival of the Class 125 engines in 1903.
> of the 60 Class (C-16's) didn't survive the 1903
> edict to install automatic air and equipment and
>
I've hever heard that reason given before, do you have a source for it?
I have heard speculation that the Class 56 engines were disposed of by the RGS, and many of the Class 60 engines were scrapped so that the D&RG, in complete control of RGS since 1896, could lease engines to RGS for it's own profit. Don't know if that was the plan but it certainly worked out that way. Note that 1904 is also the point at which D&RG was digging up funds for WP construction wherever it could.

cheers,
hank
Subject Author Posted

Locos on the RGS

Grant Horvath May 23, 2016 08:13PM

Re: Locos on the RGS

Tim Bain May 23, 2016 08:46PM

Re: Locos on the RGS

davidtltc May 23, 2016 09:22PM

Re: Locos on the RGS

Tim Bain May 23, 2016 09:57PM

Re: Locos on the RGS

BrianJ May 24, 2016 10:27AM

Re: Locos on the RGS Attachments

Chris Walker May 23, 2016 09:37PM

Re: Locos on the RGS

Herb Kelsey May 24, 2016 01:58PM

Re: Locos on the RGS

hank May 25, 2016 10:06AM

Re: Locos on the RGS

Herb Kelsey May 26, 2016 12:10AM

Re: Locos on the RGS

Herb Kelsey May 26, 2016 12:28AM

Re: Locos on the RGS

Rader Sidetrack May 27, 2016 06:51PM

Re: more on Table / Column display

Brian Norden May 28, 2016 12:27PM

Re: Locos on the RGS

Grant Horvath May 28, 2016 08:36PM

Re: Locos on the RGS

Earl May 26, 2016 06:06AM

Re: Locos on the RGS

Herb Kelsey May 26, 2016 07:08PM

Class 56 on D&RG

hank May 29, 2016 11:17AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login