Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: C&TS added ridership

PRSL
March 23, 2003 02:34PM
Frank,
Guess your direction in 3ed sentence was intended to read Westward (1.42%).
As I see it, the revenue capacity is the #487 westward load limit to Cumbres and not the climb up the 4%, PLUS even what extra it can handle down grade back to Antonito. Store all surplus available equipment at Cumbres and always dispatch from Antonito with maximum load limit. Leave cars at Cumbres which can not be pulled back east out of Chama. Add as many cars to EB train that can be loaded at Cumbres by local parking or by bus connection from Chama or Antonito. As the surplus cars build up at Antonito that can not be handled on the WB revenue train, advance them back to Cumbres by a one way extra, probably twice a month depending on demand and number of active cars in fleet. That WB "Cumbres Turn" could also be sold as a special excursion, with bus return.
Subject Author Posted

C&TS added ridership

Greg Scholl March 19, 2003 11:21AM

Re: C&TS added ridership

PRR March 21, 2003 04:29PM

Re: C&TS added ridership

Frank Martindell March 23, 2003 01:21PM

Re: C&TS added ridership

PRSL March 23, 2003 02:34PM

Re: C&TS added ridership

Greg Scholl March 23, 2003 08:23PM

Re: C&TS added ridership plan for one engine

PRSL March 24, 2003 08:52AM

Re: C&TS added ridership plan for one engine

Frank Martindell March 24, 2003 06:13PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.