Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: C&TS added ridership

March 23, 2003 01:21PM
Gregg:
My memory is a little thin but I think that 463 can handle 9 cars and the 487 either 11 or 12 cars up Cumbres grade. There are generally only a couple of places I have seen the trains get into trouble, one is at the "S" curve where they tend to slip and just about Coxo. As far as East bound there would be no impedments clear to Cumbres as it is a pretty steady 1 1/2% grade. I think the 4 trip schedule is more predicated upon not running on Monday which has been traditionally a poor day and getting enough time to be sure that 487 gets the attention it needs between trips without interupting the schedules of rebuilds on the other engines. There was a most interesting analysis made earlier in the week on getting the locos back in service and the scheduling of rebuilds although I think that it left out the possibility of putting either 482 or 492 back in service as part of the overall plan in the future. My understanding is that 492 was shopped right before the end and has little time since the last rebuild on it. It it passed the new tighter inspection standards it might be back in no time.
Frank
Subject Author Posted

C&TS added ridership

Greg Scholl March 19, 2003 11:21AM

Re: C&TS added ridership

PRR March 21, 2003 04:29PM

Re: C&TS added ridership

Frank Martindell March 23, 2003 01:21PM

Re: C&TS added ridership

PRSL March 23, 2003 02:34PM

Re: C&TS added ridership

Greg Scholl March 23, 2003 08:23PM

Re: C&TS added ridership plan for one engine

PRSL March 24, 2003 08:52AM

Re: C&TS added ridership plan for one engine

Frank Martindell March 24, 2003 06:13PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.