Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: SVR Narrow to Standard conversion?

August 11, 2013 06:18PM
Without looking up actual dates, it might be that when the NCO began converting the SV considered following suit. Had this proposal actually happened it would have created a bridge line between the UP in Oregon and the CP/SP in Nevada, though it is now debateable whether the traffic would have warrented the expense.

There would have been some advantage for traffic arriving or departing on the UP, but this was relatively small and consisted mostly of LCL and mining/milling equipment or supplies. They might have thought the mining boom would last longer than it did, but history should have told them this was seldom the case. Sawmilling did outlast the railroad, the very last revenue train was three carloads of machinery for Oregon Lumber Co., but this traffic would never have justified the expense. The lumber that was the primary traffic was all off loaded at Baker for further processing, and nearly all cattle shipments were to and from Baker Valley, so there was no trans-shipment involved with these commodities. (However, had the connection with the NCO happened there might have been some cattle shipments over this line, with connections East and West from Nevada.)

So there might have been some justification for converting but, as with the Rio Grande, the traffic did not warrent the cost. Why they thought it might, I have no idea.
Subject Author Posted

SVR Narrow to Standard conversion?

terry fosback August 07, 2013 06:54PM

Re: SVR Narrow to Standard conversion? Attachments

J.B.Bane August 07, 2013 07:48PM

Re: SVR Narrow to Standard conversion?

Brian Norden August 07, 2013 08:01PM

Re: SVR Narrow to Standard conversion?

J.B.Bane August 07, 2013 08:20PM

Re: SVR Narrow to Standard conversion?

Chris Walker August 07, 2013 08:29PM

Re: SVR Narrow to Standard conversion?

J.B.Bane August 07, 2013 09:09PM

Re: UP cars

Chris Walker August 07, 2013 09:51PM

Re: UP cars

weston1879 August 07, 2013 10:12PM

Re: UP cars

Brian Norden August 07, 2013 11:32PM

Re: UP cars

Ken Martin August 13, 2013 07:27AM

Re: UP cars

Chris Walker August 13, 2013 03:24PM

Re: UP cars

Chris Walker November 05, 2014 08:01PM

Re: SVR Narrow to Standard conversion?

Ken Martin August 13, 2013 06:53AM

Re: SVR Narrow to Standard conversion?

jim pallow August 08, 2013 06:49AM

Re: SVR Narrow to Standard conversion?

LOGGERHOGGER August 08, 2013 08:19AM

Re: SVR Narrow to Standard conversion? Attachments

J.B.Bane August 10, 2013 04:59PM

Re: SVR Narrow to Standard conversion?

Jim Grigsby August 07, 2013 09:14PM

Re: SVR Narrow to Standard conversion?

terry fosback August 09, 2013 03:53PM

Re: SVR Narrow to Standard conversion?

bcp August 09, 2013 04:00PM

Re: SVR Narrow to Standard conversion?

Jim Grigsby August 11, 2013 06:18PM

Re: SVR Narrow to Standard conversion?

Chris Walker August 11, 2013 06:44PM

Re: SVR Narrow to Standard conversion?

Jim Grigsby August 11, 2013 07:17PM

Re: SVR Narrow to Standard conversion?

Brian Norden August 11, 2013 07:00PM

Re: SVR Narrow to Standard conversion?

Jim Grigsby August 11, 2013 07:20PM

Re: SVR Narrow to Standard conversion?

J.B.Bane August 11, 2013 08:11PM

Re: SVR Narrow to Standard conversion?

Jim Grigsby August 12, 2013 08:10PM

Re: SVR Narrow to Standard conversion?

J.B.Bane August 12, 2013 08:51PM

Re: SVR Narrow to Standard conversion? Attachments

bcp November 05, 2014 11:54PM

Re: SVR Narrow to Standard conversion?

JDLX November 06, 2014 12:26AM

Re: SVR Narrow to Standard conversion?

bcp November 06, 2014 12:31AM

Re: SVR Narrow to Standard conversion?

eric November 10, 2014 08:50AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login