Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: 195 Cosmetic Restoration

bcp
July 24, 2013 12:20AM
John C Wrote:
=======================================================
> Based on the "Haulage Capacity of Engines" table
> posted above, the 190's are only capable of 100
> tons. However, other formulas state otherwise,
> even recently discussed in another thread here. My
> calculations based on the ALCO engine hand book
> show the 190's are capable of 20,100 lbs. of
> tractive effort, vs. the 16,000 lbs. listed above.
> The 70 classes are listed with only 21,600, while
> the tractive effort formula produces a higher
> number of 25,200. If the 195 were to ever operate
> again, it should be good for 4-5 cars up the pass.
>


WP&Y used a simplified tractive effort calculation: TE = 20% of weight on drivers. I imagine they had some reason for using a non-standard method of calculation, perhaps because they had non-standard operating conditions. ???

Since they used the same calculation on all the steam engines, I think it is a valid comparison between WP&Y engine capabilities.

I'll let you know after I get my time machine operating. smiling smiley

Bruce
Subject Author Posted

195 Cosmetic Restoration

John C July 22, 2013 08:52PM

Re: 195 Cosmetic Restoration

Ryan Masecar July 22, 2013 09:46PM

Re: 195 Cosmetic Restoration

Earl July 23, 2013 01:11PM

Re: 195 Cosmetic Restoration

Stewart Rhine July 23, 2013 04:46PM

Re: 195 Cosmetic Restoration

SCVR66 July 23, 2013 09:44PM

Re: 195 Cosmetic Restoration

m.j.peltier July 23, 2013 11:21PM

Re: 195 Cosmetic Restoration

bcp July 23, 2013 11:38PM

Re: 195 Cosmetic Restoration

Popeye8762 July 24, 2013 12:33PM

Re: 195 Cosmetic Restoration

John C May 21, 2014 06:39PM

Re: 195 Cosmetic Restoration

John C July 24, 2013 12:07AM

Re: 195 Cosmetic Restoration

bcp July 24, 2013 12:20AM

Re: 195 Cosmetic Restoration -small parts, and an Australian restoration

bcp July 24, 2013 12:36AM

Re: 195 Cosmetic Restoration

Popeye8762 July 24, 2013 12:30PM

Re: 195 Cosmetic Restoration

m.j.peltier July 24, 2013 06:13PM

Re: 195 Cosmetic Restoration

John C July 24, 2013 04:21PM

Re: 195 Cosmetic Restoration

CVR220 August 04, 2013 11:18AM

Re: 195 Cosmetic Restoration

John C May 24, 2014 05:33PM

Re: 195 Cosmetic Restoration

CVR220 May 24, 2014 07:56PM

Re: 195 Cosmetic Restoration

CVR220 May 26, 2014 05:36PM

Re: 195 Cosmetic Restoration

John C May 26, 2014 05:45PM

Re: 195 Cosmetic Restoration

Mike Stillwell May 27, 2014 08:23AM

Re: 195 Cosmetic Restoration

John C May 31, 2014 02:53PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login