Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Keep 483 off the pedestal - Use a 490 instead

January 16, 2012 01:13PM
Herb:
Thanks for redirecting this thread. The issue of stuff-and-mounting 483 in Chama is a really bad idea. Before they decide which engine to put on display, how about an expert's opinion along with some boiler thickness data collected in those spots know for problems on each engine.
The 490's boiler was designed and built and ran for 20 years before the K36 engines were produced. Looking at the 492 and 483 beside each other you can see the design differences in the number or lack of flexible staybolts in each boiler. It would be sad to stuff and mount 483 and then do a form 4 on 492 and find it unsuitable for today's regulations or require a new boiler. To my knowledge neither boiler has really been tested for wall thickness.
My first ride on C&TS was behind 483 in 1972, Driving East after getting out of the Navy.

Bob Meckley
Subject Author Posted

Keep 483 off the pedestal - Use a 490 instead

Herb Kelsey January 15, 2012 02:19PM

Re: Keep 483 off the pedestal - Use a 490 instead

hogger42 January 15, 2012 02:49PM

Re: Keep 483 off the pedestal - Use a 490 instead

El Skonk January 15, 2012 02:59PM

Re: Keep 483 off the pedestal - Use a 490 instead

DKRickman January 15, 2012 04:08PM

Re: Keep 483 off the pedestal - Use a 490 instead

Bob Meckley January 16, 2012 01:13PM

I disagree

skidmk January 16, 2012 01:52PM

Re: I disagree

Steve Singer January 16, 2012 03:32PM

Re: I disagree - sort of

Russo Loco January 16, 2012 04:07PM

Re: Keep 483 off the pedestal - Use a 490 instead

Greg Scholl January 16, 2012 03:59PM

Re: Keep 483 off the pedestal - Use a 490 instead

guymonmd January 16, 2012 04:51PM

Re: Keep 483 off the pedestal - Use a 490 instead

NGJunkie January 16, 2012 06:39PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login