Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: C&TS ridership

August 18, 2010 05:54PM
bookemdanno Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Even at 24% that sucks. But I guess I would agree
> that the double headed run up to Cumbres is
> something that is an essential part of the
> experience.
>
> Dan

I would guess that the bridge situation planted some uncertainty into tourists minds, accounting for some of the slowdown. However, I would guess the economic conditions had more to do with less riders than anything.
As an example the Hamilton County Fair (This is the county Cincinnati, Ohio is in) had attendance down this summer by 50%!!!
Thats mainstream USA, not rail related of course.
Given the ridership is down so much I cannot see how they justified spending $50K to move another engine to Cumbres. I know what the logic is, to have a backup engine, and for when engines have boiler washes. However, there are only around 60 days left in the schedule. Oh well, thats why I don't get the big bucks to make those decisions.
Greg
Subject Author Posted

C&TS ridership

Tomstp August 18, 2010 03:08PM

Re: C&TS ridership

bookemdanno August 18, 2010 04:53PM

Re: C&TS ridership

Greg Scholl August 18, 2010 05:54PM

Re: C&TS ridership

michael August 18, 2010 06:36PM

Re: C&TS ridership

Tom Stewart August 18, 2010 07:21PM

Re: C&TS ridership

Ohio_Narrow_Minded August 18, 2010 08:11PM

Re: C&TS ridership

weston1879 August 18, 2010 08:25PM

Re: C&TS ridership

JamesDurrenberger August 19, 2010 11:56AM

3 engines on the east side.

Roger Hogan August 18, 2010 08:24PM

Re: 3 engines on the east side.

Greg Scholl August 19, 2010 09:36AM

Re: 3 engines on the east side.

snowtownbob August 19, 2010 02:11PM

Re: 3 engines on the east side.

michael August 19, 2010 03:04PM

Re: 3 engines on the east side.

Jim Herron August 19, 2010 07:20PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login