Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: The answer may be.....

December 31, 2009 10:46AM
Quote
John West
In rereading Tom's captions more carefully, it looks as if there were indeed two trains, eight days apart. On March 13, 1963 the 480 and 483 took a flanger/spreader snow clearing train from Alamosa to Chama, and returned (with tank cars to Cumbres) on March 14. The 480 and 483 took another flanger/spreader snow clearing train from Alamosa to Chama on March 20, taking 36 hours due to slides and derailments. So the return movement up the hill, again with tank cars to Cumbres plus the flanger and spreader, was not until March 22. Hopefully my interpretation of the dates in Tom's captions is correct. He got pix of both trains.

It took me a little while to get around to doing research on this topic. Thought I would toss my findings into the mix and make things a little more confusing.

March 13, 1963
Alamosa extra west with engines 483 and 480 with 4 empties, which include 2 caboose, spreader and flanger
Conductor Andriko
Engine 483 Dunn
Engine 480 Faucette

From Antonito to Chama 6 hours 30 minutes flange and spread snow.

March 14, 1963
Chama extra east with engines 483 and 480 with 8 loads 4 empties, again include 2 caboose, spreader and flanger

At Cumbres set out the 8 loads.
With engines coupled continue east. Cumbres to MP 305 2 hours 40 minutes spreading snow. Engines stayed coupled to Alamosa.

March 15, 1963
Alamosa extra west with engines 480 and 484
Conductor Thayne
Engine 480 Dunn
Engine 484 Sisemore

Depart Alamosa with 39 loads 7 empties, (no spreader)
At Cumbres engine 480 cut out and run light to Chama
Engine 484 arrive Chama with 39 loads 1 empty

March 16, 1963
Chama extra east with engines 480 and 484
Conductor Thayne
Engine 484 Dunn
Engine 480 Sisemore

Depart Chama with 8 loads 1 empty
At Cumbres engine 484 cut out and run light to Alamosa
Engine 480 pick up 8 loads and run Cumbres to Durango with 16 loads 1 empty

March 20, 1963
Alamosa extra west with engines 480 and 483, 2 caboose, spreader and flanger
Conductor Andriko
Engine 483 Dunn
Engine 480 Jack
Depart Alamosa 9:10 AM

Alamosa extra west with engines 497 and 484
Conductor Smith
Engine 497 Otteson
Engine 484 Hawkins

Depart Alamosa 11:20 AM with 44 loads 10 empties

Engine 483 derailed at MP 323 and both trains spent the night at Osier

Engines 483 and 480 arrive Chama March 21at 6:20 PM
Engine 497 arrive Chama 6:30 PM and Engine 497 with train arrive Chama 6:45 PM March 21.

March 22, 1963
Chama extra east with engines 483 and 480
Conductor Andriko
Engine 483 Dunn
Engine 480 Jack

Depart Chama with 8 loads and spreader, flanger, 2 caboose
At Cumbres set out 8 loads, Cumbres to Osier 2 hours spread snow, stay coupled to Alamosa

Chama extra east with engines 484 and 497
Conductor Smith
Engine 484 Otteson
Engine 497 Hawkins

Depart Chama with 6 loads 15 empties
At Cumbres engine 484 cut out and run light to Alamosa
Extra 497 east pick up the 8 loads
Arrive Alamosa with 15 loads 17 empties

I thought I had the date for Rich’s photo narrowed down to March 16. Correct to read March 14. (Edit 1-1-10) On that date there had been fresh snow at Chama and no spreader on the east bound. However, according to the train sheet the head engine on that date was 484.
My guess for Russ’ photo at Dalton would be March 14, however it could also be March 22. (Edit 1-1-10)

Anyway, more food for pondering

Jimmy



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/01/2010 09:00PM by Jimmy Blouch.
Subject Author Posted

480 and a Gramps train Attachments

Rich Muth December 21, 2009 03:52PM

Re: 480 and a Gramps train

John West December 21, 2009 04:22PM

Re: 480 and a Gramps train

Rich Muth December 21, 2009 04:27PM

Re: 480 and a Gramps train

BrianJ December 21, 2009 06:45PM

Some additonal info about this operation

John West December 21, 2009 07:28PM

Re: Some additonal info about this operation

Jerry Day December 21, 2009 07:36PM

Re: Some additonal info about this operation

Greg Scholl December 22, 2009 09:37AM

Re: Additonal info re "Narrow Gauge ... Then & Now" Attachments

Russo Loco December 22, 2009 10:45AM

Re: Additonal info re "Narrow Gauge ... Then & Now"

John Cole December 22, 2009 12:04PM

Re: Additonal info re "Narrow Gauge ... Then & Now"

Jimmy Blouch December 24, 2009 01:23PM

Re: Additonal info re "Narrow Gauge ... Then & Now"

Rich Muth December 24, 2009 02:00PM

Thanks guys!

John Cole December 24, 2009 03:56PM

Re: Thanks guys!

Jimmy Blouch December 24, 2009 04:10PM

Re: Thanks guys!

Greg Scholl December 26, 2009 06:59AM

Re: Thanks guys!

Jimmy Blouch December 27, 2009 11:30AM

Re: Thanks guys!

CharlieMcCandless December 27, 2009 08:35PM

Speed Limit Sign

Rich Muth December 28, 2009 07:01AM

Re: Speed Limit Sign

Earl December 29, 2009 09:10PM

Re: Speed Limit Sign

Greg Scholl December 30, 2009 07:42AM

Re: Additonal info re "Narrow Gauge ... Then & Now"

Greg Scholl December 22, 2009 12:12PM

Re: Additonal info re "Narrow Gauge ... Then & Now"

Russo Loco December 23, 2009 11:23AM

Three-rail operations of the DRGW

John West December 23, 2009 11:33AM

Re: Some additonal info about this operation

Jerry Day December 22, 2009 11:33AM

Re: Some additonal info about this operation

Russo Loco October 28, 2013 09:29PM

Two differnt trains???

Kevin Cook December 23, 2009 12:30PM

Re: Two different trains???

Russo Loco December 23, 2009 01:16PM

Re: Two differnt trains???

Jerry Day December 23, 2009 04:47PM

Re: Two differnt trains???

Russo Loco October 28, 2013 09:31PM

Re: Two differnt trains???

Mike Trent December 23, 2009 06:43PM

Extra caboose

John West December 23, 2009 07:23PM

Re: Extra caboose

Jerry Day December 23, 2009 07:28PM

OK - You get the Award

Kevin Cook December 24, 2009 01:05AM

Re: Two different trains? ... and two awards!

Russo Loco December 24, 2009 02:29AM

Re: Two different trains? ... and the award!

Mike Trent December 24, 2009 03:55PM

Re: Two differnt trains???

drgwk37 October 31, 2013 08:29AM

Re: 480 and a Gramps train

Earl December 24, 2009 12:19AM

The answer may be.....

John West December 27, 2009 09:05PM

Re: The answer may be ... but which is which?

Russo Loco December 28, 2009 02:53PM

Tom's notes

John West December 28, 2009 03:30PM

Re: Tom's notes

Russo Loco December 28, 2009 03:37PM

Re: The answer may be.....

Earl December 29, 2009 09:40PM

Re: And (most of) the answer is ...

Russo Loco December 30, 2009 10:13AM

Re: And (most of) the answer is ...

CharlieMcCandless December 30, 2009 11:26AM

Re: And (most of) the answer is ...

Russo Loco December 30, 2009 11:37AM

Re: And (most of) the answer is ...

Jerry Day December 30, 2009 05:00PM

Re: And (most of) the answer is ...

Russo Loco December 31, 2009 12:07AM

Re: And (most of) the answer is ...

Jerry Day December 31, 2009 09:47AM

Re: The answer may be.....

Jimmy Blouch December 31, 2009 10:46AM

Re: The answer may be.....

Russo Loco January 01, 2010 07:36PM

Thanks Jimmy....

John West January 01, 2010 11:01PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login