Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Two differnt trains???

December 23, 2009 04:47PM
Russo Loco Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hi, Kevin -
>
> Good point - and sharp eyes!
>
> My notes from Tom simply say "Flanger Train,
> Antonito to Chama to Alamosa, March, 1963."
> Is it possible that this train cleared the siding
> at Lobato, and then switched the order of the
> snow-fighting equipment? Rich's photo clearly
> shows the front of a flanger - NOT the spreader -
>
> immediately behind #480, and the third one I
> posted clearly shows the spreader right behind
> the helper. It's also possible that Tom sent me
> photos of two different eastbound trains - both
> with eight tank cars - but he did not indicate
> this in his notes.
>
> - Russ
Russ:
I do not have detailed train operations from 63 from dispatcher books or train registers, but a number of flanger/spreader trains were run in 62, 63, and 64 using 480 and 483. 483 was equipped with a plow pilot, so was always in the lead. Jim Barton's father also photographed some of these trains and the consist varied. Normally the trains would come out of Alamosa with the spreader and flanger behind the second engine. At Alamosa, the train was switched so that the flanger (usually OL) was behind the first engine and Spreader OU behind the second. Tom sent me a scan of one of his slides showing 480 preparing to couple onto the tank cars and it clearly shows the flanger behind 480 with the spreader behind the flanger followed by the two cabooses.

Jerry Day
Subject Author Posted

480 and a Gramps train Attachments

Rich Muth December 21, 2009 03:52PM

Re: 480 and a Gramps train

John West December 21, 2009 04:22PM

Re: 480 and a Gramps train

Rich Muth December 21, 2009 04:27PM

Re: 480 and a Gramps train

BrianJ December 21, 2009 06:45PM

Some additonal info about this operation

John West December 21, 2009 07:28PM

Re: Some additonal info about this operation

Jerry Day December 21, 2009 07:36PM

Re: Some additonal info about this operation

Greg Scholl December 22, 2009 09:37AM

Re: Additonal info re "Narrow Gauge ... Then & Now" Attachments

Russo Loco December 22, 2009 10:45AM

Re: Additonal info re "Narrow Gauge ... Then & Now"

John Cole December 22, 2009 12:04PM

Re: Additonal info re "Narrow Gauge ... Then & Now"

Jimmy Blouch December 24, 2009 01:23PM

Re: Additonal info re "Narrow Gauge ... Then & Now"

Rich Muth December 24, 2009 02:00PM

Thanks guys!

John Cole December 24, 2009 03:56PM

Re: Thanks guys!

Jimmy Blouch December 24, 2009 04:10PM

Re: Thanks guys!

Greg Scholl December 26, 2009 06:59AM

Re: Thanks guys!

Jimmy Blouch December 27, 2009 11:30AM

Re: Thanks guys!

CharlieMcCandless December 27, 2009 08:35PM

Speed Limit Sign

Rich Muth December 28, 2009 07:01AM

Re: Speed Limit Sign

Earl December 29, 2009 09:10PM

Re: Speed Limit Sign

Greg Scholl December 30, 2009 07:42AM

Re: Additonal info re "Narrow Gauge ... Then & Now"

Greg Scholl December 22, 2009 12:12PM

Re: Additonal info re "Narrow Gauge ... Then & Now"

Russo Loco December 23, 2009 11:23AM

Three-rail operations of the DRGW

John West December 23, 2009 11:33AM

Re: Some additonal info about this operation

Jerry Day December 22, 2009 11:33AM

Re: Some additonal info about this operation

Russo Loco October 28, 2013 09:29PM

Two differnt trains???

Kevin Cook December 23, 2009 12:30PM

Re: Two different trains???

Russo Loco December 23, 2009 01:16PM

Re: Two differnt trains???

Jerry Day December 23, 2009 04:47PM

Re: Two differnt trains???

Russo Loco October 28, 2013 09:31PM

Re: Two differnt trains???

Mike Trent December 23, 2009 06:43PM

Extra caboose

John West December 23, 2009 07:23PM

Re: Extra caboose

Jerry Day December 23, 2009 07:28PM

OK - You get the Award

Kevin Cook December 24, 2009 01:05AM

Re: Two different trains? ... and two awards!

Russo Loco December 24, 2009 02:29AM

Re: Two different trains? ... and the award!

Mike Trent December 24, 2009 03:55PM

Re: Two differnt trains???

drgwk37 October 31, 2013 08:29AM

Re: 480 and a Gramps train

Earl December 24, 2009 12:19AM

The answer may be.....

John West December 27, 2009 09:05PM

Re: The answer may be ... but which is which?

Russo Loco December 28, 2009 02:53PM

Tom's notes

John West December 28, 2009 03:30PM

Re: Tom's notes

Russo Loco December 28, 2009 03:37PM

Re: The answer may be.....

Earl December 29, 2009 09:40PM

Re: And (most of) the answer is ...

Russo Loco December 30, 2009 10:13AM

Re: And (most of) the answer is ...

CharlieMcCandless December 30, 2009 11:26AM

Re: And (most of) the answer is ...

Russo Loco December 30, 2009 11:37AM

Re: And (most of) the answer is ...

Jerry Day December 30, 2009 05:00PM

Re: And (most of) the answer is ...

Russo Loco December 31, 2009 12:07AM

Re: And (most of) the answer is ...

Jerry Day December 31, 2009 09:47AM

Re: The answer may be.....

Jimmy Blouch December 31, 2009 10:46AM

Re: The answer may be.....

Russo Loco January 01, 2010 07:36PM

Thanks Jimmy....

John West January 01, 2010 11:01PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login