Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: #19 and the rerail operation of 497.

October 04, 2001 09:41PM
Guys...
I have to admit that I was astonsihed what the #19 could do, after it was put in service in Chama. It has four series-wound traction motors, which create tremendous tractive effort at low speed. (Keep in mind that this little locomotive has all its 47 tons on drivers.) (The #19, although similar to a GE 44 ton locomotive, is not identical. It was built-to-order for the US Navy, and has a heavier, articulated frame.)
Having seen with my own eyes, this beast drag two coupled derelict K-36's out of their beds after several years of dormancy, I respect this piece of machinery very much. I was severely criticized when I brought it from Honolulu to Chama, but I've never regretted it, and never will.
Bob Keller
Subject Author Posted

#19 and the rerail operation of 497.

Jim Burrill October 04, 2001 02:22PM

Re: #19 and the rerail operation of 497.

jaybawb October 04, 2001 06:59PM

Re: #19 and the rerail operation of 497.

Jim McKee October 04, 2001 08:47PM

Re: #19 and the rerail operation of 497. *PIC*

jaybawb October 04, 2001 09:17PM

Re: #19 and the rerail operation of 497.

Bob Keller October 04, 2001 09:41PM

Re: #19 and the rerail operation of 497.

jaybawb October 05, 2001 07:34AM

Re: #19 and the rerail operation of 497.

John Hammond October 05, 2001 08:27PM

Re: #19 and the rerail operation of 497.

jaybawb October 06, 2001 07:53AM

Re: #19 and the rerail operation of 497.

Dave Lamson (ex-B&M) October 06, 2001 05:53AM

Re: #19 and the rerail operation of 497.

Paul Hollidge October 06, 2001 12:13AM

Re: #19 and the rerail operation of 497.

jaybawb October 06, 2001 02:23PM

Re: #19 and the rerail operation of 497.

Earl Knoob October 07, 2001 08:57PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.