Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: #19 and the rerail operation of 497.

October 04, 2001 06:59PM
Being under steam made for some interesting positions of workers under the engine. I suspect there were a few minor burns.
It was a 'push', not a 'pull'. A 'pull' would have been awkward as there was no way line up couplers.
Since 497 had a train attached, and it would have required some fancy manouvering to unattach the train, the whole thing was shoved back. I doubt if #19 could have done it. In any case, 489 was dispatched from Cumbres as soon as the incident was reported, so sufficient motive power was there.
Subject Author Posted

#19 and the rerail operation of 497.

Jim Burrill October 04, 2001 02:22PM

Re: #19 and the rerail operation of 497.

jaybawb October 04, 2001 06:59PM

Re: #19 and the rerail operation of 497.

Jim McKee October 04, 2001 08:47PM

Re: #19 and the rerail operation of 497. *PIC*

jaybawb October 04, 2001 09:17PM

Re: #19 and the rerail operation of 497.

Bob Keller October 04, 2001 09:41PM

Re: #19 and the rerail operation of 497.

jaybawb October 05, 2001 07:34AM

Re: #19 and the rerail operation of 497.

John Hammond October 05, 2001 08:27PM

Re: #19 and the rerail operation of 497.

jaybawb October 06, 2001 07:53AM

Re: #19 and the rerail operation of 497.

Dave Lamson (ex-B&M) October 06, 2001 05:53AM

Re: #19 and the rerail operation of 497.

Paul Hollidge October 06, 2001 12:13AM

Re: #19 and the rerail operation of 497.

jaybawb October 06, 2001 02:23PM

Re: #19 and the rerail operation of 497.

Earl Knoob October 07, 2001 08:57PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.