Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: SVRY #19

June 29, 2009 10:46PM
The general rule of thumb for a Form 4 on a medium-sized locomotive, according to "those in the know," starts at about $500,000 and goes up from there. To a certain extent that figure can be reduced by volunteers. But so much of the work has to be done by licensed, certified, and otherwise highly-skilled personal, you are not going to be able to chisel away a lot of that $500,000.

There are good reasons for doing it right the first time from the rail head to the top of the stack. The first is that cut-rate maintenance work will only come back to nickel-and-dime you to death over the next 15 years.

The second is an emerging concept in liability law called "best practices." I have spoken about this concept before on this forum. Both federal laws, rules, and regulations, and the general consensus of professionals who work in the profession provides a body of required and recommended practices for steam locomotive maintenance and repair. This body of requirements and recommendations constitute "best practices." Some of those "best practices" comprise the Form 4 process, an inescapable requirement. But there are other practices that do not carry the force of law, but which nonetheless lay out a framework for sound maintenance and repair practices.

Yes, you can cut corners and do only the minimum necessary to meet the requirements of the Form 4 to return the locomotive to operation. But you place yourself and your organization at peril if you have a maintenance-related failure that leads to an accident, such as a derailment/rollover, in which passengers are injured or killed. You will, of course, be sued. And what will you say on the witness stand when the attorney for the plaintiffs asks you if your shops followed all customary required and accepted "best practices, " and you have to say, "Well, I guess not"? See my point? Do it right in the first place, and save yourself a lot of brain damage down the road!

The world of steam railroading changed forever following the implementation of the new Federal steam locomotive regulations. Everyone's life is now more complicated, difficult--and expensive. Whether you are an insular railroad or not, you had best be playing by the rules of the game. The rules are the rules, and you can choose to play along--or give into the urge to cut corners and calculate your risks. Your choice--not mine.

PS. In the global scheme of things, the steam railroading community is a very small one--and from an actuarial point of view. There are opportunities for synergy everywhere. But each and every member of the community also has a responsibility to act professionally in his or her operation for the good of the community. One serious accident, one fatality, would be the kiss of death for the steam railroading world as a whole. You can be sure that insurance rates would go through the roof, to the detriment of every operator. Or worse still, insurance would simply become unavailable. Don't take shortcuts; play by the rules, no matter how onerous they may seem. You'll be glad you did!

Mike Rowe
Subject Author Posted

SVRY #19

Eric Bolton June 29, 2009 12:32AM

Re: SVRY #19

Dan Robirds June 29, 2009 10:36AM

Re: SVRY #19

colodreamer June 30, 2009 08:26PM

Re: SVRY #19

Dan Robirds June 30, 2009 09:30PM

Re: SVRY #19

Nelson Bros Lumber Co. June 30, 2009 09:40PM

Re: SVRY #19

J.B.Bane July 01, 2009 11:20AM

Re: SVRY #19

South Park July 05, 2009 11:55PM

Re: SVRY #19

Bill Dennehy July 06, 2009 05:42AM

Re: SVRY #19

Dave Boyer June 30, 2009 11:23PM

Re: SVRY #19

Russo Loco July 01, 2009 12:17AM

Re: SVRY #19

Russo Loco July 01, 2009 12:20AM

Re: SVRY #19

dan June 29, 2009 06:33PM

Re: SVRY #19

J.B.Bane June 29, 2009 09:46PM

Re: SVRY #19

mikerowe June 29, 2009 10:46PM

Re: SVRY #19

Kelly Anderson July 01, 2009 07:45AM

Re: SVRY #19

mikerowe July 01, 2009 09:15AM

Re: SVRY #19

cynthia christy July 02, 2009 04:34PM

Re: SVRY #19

colodreamer July 02, 2009 09:18PM

Re: SVRY #19

El Skonk July 03, 2009 10:20AM

Re: SVRY #19

J.B.Bane July 03, 2009 10:38AM

Re: SVRY #19

SMITTY July 03, 2009 01:46PM

Re: SVRY #19

colodreamer July 03, 2009 07:33PM

Re: SVRY #19

cynthia christy July 05, 2009 11:30AM

Re: SVRY #19

J.B.Bane July 05, 2009 12:39PM

Re: SVRY #19

Jim Grigsby July 06, 2009 08:06PM

Re: SVRY #19

Jeff Chittick July 06, 2009 10:02PM

Re: SVRY #19

John E. Bull July 11, 2009 07:40PM

Re: SVRY #19

Kelly Anderson July 11, 2009 08:33PM

Re: SVRY #19

South Park July 12, 2009 12:13AM

Re: SVRY #19

Kelly Anderson July 12, 2009 06:03AM

Re: SVRY #19

J.B.Bane July 12, 2009 11:15AM

Re: SVRY #19

MD Ramsey July 16, 2009 09:57PM

Re: SVRY #19

cynthia christy July 16, 2009 02:50PM

Re: SVRY #19

Andrew Brandon July 16, 2009 07:41PM

Re: SVRY #19

El Skonk July 17, 2009 12:22PM

Re: SVRY #19

Nelson Bros Lumber Co. July 17, 2009 01:51PM

Re: SVRY #19

cynthia christy July 21, 2009 10:39AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login