Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Paid staff vs Contractors

October 13, 2009 04:32PM
I have been wondering if there is anybody out there with direct experience dealing with paid staff vs contractors in the steam and or preservation world. There is some debate among some people that I know that say contractors are more cost effective than paid staff. I can't see it, contractors cost more and don't care about your specific project or equipment. BUT, they have a standard to maintain and have to produce good work to stay in business. For example, I know that a certain railroad contractor charges a minimum $2500 per day, but they get a lot done and do pretty good work.

So heres the question: Which is more cost effective, paid staff or contractors?
Subject Author Posted

Paid staff vs Contractors

Garrett Augustus October 13, 2009 04:32PM

Re: Paid staff vs Contractors

Brian Norden October 13, 2009 05:27PM

Re: Paid staff vs Contractors

Taylor Rush October 13, 2009 09:41PM

Re: Paid staff vs Contractors

Marty Knox October 14, 2009 05:06AM

Re: Paid staff vs Contractors

SandingValve October 14, 2009 04:17PM

Re: Paid staff vs Contractors

ryanpce October 15, 2009 12:13AM

Re: Paid staff vs Contractors

Jim Grigsby October 15, 2009 11:28AM

Re: Paid staff vs Contractors

Garrett Augustus October 15, 2009 04:07PM

Re: Paid staff vs Contractors

GeorgeGaskill October 15, 2009 05:08PM

Re: Paid staff vs Contractors

SandingValve October 15, 2009 10:28PM

Re: Paid staff vs Contractors

Garrett Augustus October 16, 2009 12:10AM

Re: Paid staff vs Contractors

SandingValve October 16, 2009 11:52AM

Re: Paid staff vs Contractors

Jim Grigsby October 16, 2009 03:22PM

Re: Paid staff vs Contractors

Russo Loco October 16, 2009 12:08PM

Re: Paid staff vs Contractors

Garrett Augustus October 16, 2009 10:18PM

Re: Paid staff vs Contractors

dbbii October 17, 2009 07:27AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login