Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Agents in final D&RGW NG years

March 05, 2009 11:49AM avatar
Based on empirical observation, not knowledge of the agreements, the answer to you first question is it depended on the work load and the jobs could be combined. From what I saw on the DRGW ng. all the jobs west of Alamosa were combined agent/telegraphers. More generally, and this is based on my days working for the SP, depending on the size of the work load, the arrangement could vary from a single agent/telegrapher, to an agent with a whole bunch of clerks and telegraphers working for him. In the large agencies the agent might be an exempt or officer position (not subject to bid) if I remember correctly.

In answer to your second question, presumably the shipper of the car from Lumberton would take (drive) his bill of lading to the closest open office. Depending on the size of the shipper and how the shipping company was organized, the bill of lading might be delivered to a railroad agent at a very different location. At the risk of saying the obvious, it was the development of highways and communications services that allowed the railroads to close the plethora of agencies that used to dot every line, when bills of lading had to be walked to an agent of the railroad.

One of the things I find very interesting is Bob Richardson's statement that the Farmington station for some period had the highest cash reciepts of any station on the DRGW. Since virtually all the traffic was inbound, apparently the drilling pipe and/or mud was billed COD, which seems a bit strange to me. But it must have had something to do with the nature of the drilling supply business.

JBWX
Subject Author Posted

Agents in final D&RGW NG years

Les Jarrett March 05, 2009 12:41AM

Re: Agents in final D&RGW NG years

Eugene Blabey March 05, 2009 09:29AM

Re: Agents in final D&RGW NG years

Al Stevenson March 05, 2009 10:46AM

Re: Agents in final D&RGW NG years

John Craft March 05, 2009 10:58AM

Re: Agents in final D&RGW NG years

John West March 05, 2009 11:49AM

Re: Agents in final D&RGW NG years

John Craft March 05, 2009 03:45PM

Re: Agents in final D&RGW NG years

Al Stevenson March 05, 2009 07:54PM

Bills of Lading versus Waybills versus Freight Bills

John West March 05, 2009 09:07PM

Re: Bills of Lading versus Waybills versus Freight Bills

John Craft March 06, 2009 04:01AM

Obscure bits of history

John West March 06, 2009 10:39AM

Re: Obscure bits of history Attachments

CharlieMcCandless March 06, 2009 11:17AM

Re: Obscure bits of history

Jimmy Blouch March 06, 2009 11:20AM

Re: Obscure bits of history

Wayne Laepple March 06, 2009 01:16PM

Re: Agents in final D&RGW NG years

John West March 05, 2009 11:12AM

Re: Agents in final D&RGW NG years

Fritz Klinke March 08, 2009 10:39PM

1966 work train

John West March 08, 2009 11:23PM

Re: Agents in final D&RGW NG years

Floppo March 09, 2009 08:22PM

Re: Agents in final D&RGW NG years

Fritz Klinke March 09, 2009 11:42PM

Re: Agents in final D&RGW NG years

Floppo March 10, 2009 06:44PM

Re: Agents in final D&RGW NG years

Fritz Klinke March 10, 2009 08:21PM

Re: Agents in final D&RGW NG years

Floppo March 10, 2009 10:56PM

Re: Agents in final D&RGW NG years

CharlieMcCandless March 11, 2009 08:26PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login