Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Operating Vs. Static Locomotives

August 11, 2008 08:39AM avatar
I agree with you on that.

The railroads didn't care if it was a locomotive's origional boiler, driver centers, or whatever. They replaced the parts that needed to be replaced to return the locomotive to service. There is no such thing as a "historic" part. Metal is metal, parts is parts.
Subject Author Posted

Operating Vs. Static Locomotives

todengine August 11, 2008 06:49AM

Re: Operating Vs. Static Locomotives

Ryan Shofner August 11, 2008 08:39AM

Re: Operating Vs. Static Locomotives

Bill Dennehy August 11, 2008 08:52AM

Re: Operating Vs. Static Locomotives

South Park August 11, 2008 10:40PM

Re: Operating Vs. Static Locomotives

Festus August 12, 2008 10:04PM

Re: Operating Vs. Static Locomotives

Herb Kelsey August 13, 2008 09:56PM

Re: Operating Vs. Static Locomotives

Festus August 14, 2008 09:02AM

Re: As(s)bestos *-)

Russo Loco August 13, 2008 02:22AM

Re: Operating Vs. Static Locomotives

Ed Stabler August 11, 2008 02:45PM

Re: Operating Vs. Static Locomotives

J.B.Bane August 11, 2008 07:45PM

Re: Operating Vs. Static Locomotives

Todd Hohlenkamp August 13, 2008 08:31AM

Re: Operating Vs. Static Locomotives

Ed "Oilcan" Kelley August 14, 2008 11:26AM

Re: Operating Vs. Static Locomotives

Ed "Oilcan" Kelley August 14, 2008 11:29AM

Re: Operating Vs. Static Locomotives

Festus August 14, 2008 11:44AM

Re: Operating Vs. Static Locomotives

Tower Operator August 17, 2008 09:52PM

Re: Operating Vs. Static Locomotives

Ed Stabler August 18, 2008 05:44AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login