Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Coal quality

June 26, 2001 07:51AM
Actually, "mine run" may be the correct term, but we do refer to the "fines" as "bug dust". I guess terminology changes over the years. I'm actually not that upset with the fine coal. You can keep a very light fire if you keep it wet and place it in the box properly. All you need to do is spread it out and fire a little more often. The big lumps are great for drifting down the hill, but unless you break them up they can clog up the firebox of a locomotive that doesn't draft properly. I'm not sure how many of you have fired a coal burner but I'm not too excited about having to break up big lumps every scoop. Especially when you are trying to watch curves, ring the bell, adjust the setting of the injector, etc.. I suppose I'm just ranting again.
As a fireman you don't really have much choice in the load of coal you get each day. Some days are better than others. When you get a load of "fines" of big lumps it just adds to the excitement and raises the challenge.
Rob
Subject Author Posted

Coal over Cumbres?

Jason Cary June 19, 2001 03:21PM

Re: Coal over Cumbres?

william June 19, 2001 09:11PM

Re: Coal over Cumbres?

Earl June 21, 2001 07:52AM

Coal quality

Bill Kepner June 22, 2001 06:41AM

Re: Coal around Durango

PRR June 22, 2001 08:48PM

Re: Coal quality

Rob Gram June 24, 2001 06:12AM

Re: Coal quality

Al P. June 26, 2001 04:40AM

Re: Coal quality

Rob Gram June 26, 2001 07:51AM

Re: Coal quality

Al P. June 26, 2001 10:44AM

Re: Coal quality

Rob Gram June 27, 2001 06:20AM

Re: Coal quality

Mik June 28, 2001 10:41AM

Re: Coal quality

Fred T June 28, 2001 12:04PM

Re: Coal quality

Slim June 26, 2001 05:19PM

Re: Coal quality

Richard Boulware June 26, 2001 09:33PM

RGS coal after 1951

Bob Yarger June 24, 2001 11:26AM

Re: RGS coal after 1951

Jim Adams June 25, 2001 07:03PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.