Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

November 24, 2007 07:07PM avatar
For informations sake the 250/251 on the SVRy were listed as having 182,000 lbs on drivers, which is 30,333lbs per driving axle. Light wt. of engine was 218,000lbs and tender lt. wt. 82,000. The weight on the pony and trailing trucks would be something over 18,000lbs ea with the boiler full of water. The weight per axle on the tender would be 31,114lbs with a full load of water and fuel oil. Tender capacity is 3500 gal water at 8.33lbs per gal. and 1800 gal fuel oil at an average for bunker c of 7.39lbs gal. I have no idea how these stats compare to a K36 or 37, but I think it is interesting to note that the highest axle loading is not on the engine, but on the tender, which is of course the tenders we have have today behind SVRy 19 and 20. I had not worked out the math before, but a mech. engineer told me that in designing bridges for our current operation in the Sumpter Valley, he figured the highest concentrated bridge loading would be with 19 and 20 coupled tender to tender which makes sense when you look at the axle loading.
Subject Author Posted

Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

Kevin S. November 23, 2007 09:57PM

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

CharlieMcCandless November 24, 2007 09:59AM

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

stevejb123 November 24, 2007 05:42PM

factor of adhesion

CharlieMcCandless November 24, 2007 05:56PM

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

Jeff A. November 24, 2007 03:22PM

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

J.B.Bane November 24, 2007 03:27PM

I Stand Corrected.

Jeff A. November 24, 2007 04:24PM

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

Mike Trent November 29, 2007 09:05PM

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

Kevin S. November 29, 2007 09:13PM

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

dougvv November 29, 2007 09:34PM

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

Dan Robirds November 29, 2007 11:56PM

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

J.B.Bane November 30, 2007 09:17AM

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

hank November 30, 2007 12:05AM

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

dougvv November 24, 2007 03:42PM

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

bcarswell November 24, 2007 04:44PM

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

Ed Stabler November 24, 2007 05:56PM

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

J.B.Bane November 24, 2007 07:07PM

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

bcarswell November 24, 2007 08:36PM

impact vs static load - steam vs diesel

M Austin November 29, 2007 09:45PM

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

Charlie Mutschler November 30, 2007 08:52AM

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

Ed Stabler November 30, 2007 10:26AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login