Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

November 23, 2007 09:57PM
I know the C&S passed on the Uintah 2-6-6-2s because of the bridge loadings, but did the Rio Grande even consider these locomotives, and if they did, why did the Rio Grande pass on them?
Subject Author Posted

Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

Kevin S. November 23, 2007 09:57PM

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

CharlieMcCandless November 24, 2007 09:59AM

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

stevejb123 November 24, 2007 05:42PM

factor of adhesion

CharlieMcCandless November 24, 2007 05:56PM

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

Jeff A. November 24, 2007 03:22PM

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

J.B.Bane November 24, 2007 03:27PM

I Stand Corrected.

Jeff A. November 24, 2007 04:24PM

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

Mike Trent November 29, 2007 09:05PM

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

Kevin S. November 29, 2007 09:13PM

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

dougvv November 29, 2007 09:34PM

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

Dan Robirds November 29, 2007 11:56PM

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

J.B.Bane November 30, 2007 09:17AM

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

hank November 30, 2007 12:05AM

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

dougvv November 24, 2007 03:42PM

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

bcarswell November 24, 2007 04:44PM

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

Ed Stabler November 24, 2007 05:56PM

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

J.B.Bane November 24, 2007 07:07PM

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

bcarswell November 24, 2007 08:36PM

impact vs static load - steam vs diesel

M Austin November 29, 2007 09:45PM

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

Charlie Mutschler November 30, 2007 08:52AM

Re: Uintah 2-6-6-2s and the Rio Grande

Ed Stabler November 30, 2007 10:26AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login