Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: SV 2-6-6-2s - With and Without Tanks

LOGGERHOGGER
December 13, 2006 07:53AM
The sidetank issue is interesting. Only #250 ran with both side tanks and tender and then only for a few months. SVRy did not know if the
engines would be too "slippery" without the
weight of the water in the tanks. They knew they needed more capacity for water than
the tanks allowed, thus the tenders were added.
#250 was run with her tanks in place but without
water in them for a couple months. The test worked and the SVRy shops decided they could cut down the tanks on both engines so long as they
added ballast in the form or concrete and rail to the running boards to make up for the loss of the tank weight.
#251 was the first to be converted to a tankless - tender engine while #250 still ran with her tanks and tender awaiting her turn for the final conversion process.
Martin
Subject Author Posted

SV 2-6-6-2s

Kevin December 12, 2006 05:40PM

Re: SV 2-6-6-2s *PIC*

J.B.Bane December 12, 2006 07:07PM

Re: SV 2-6-6-2s *PIC*

J.B.Bane December 12, 2006 07:15PM

Re: SV 2-6-6-2s *PIC*

J.B.Bane December 12, 2006 07:25PM

Re: SV 2-6-6-2s

Douglas vV December 12, 2006 07:35PM

Partial answers

Jeff A. December 12, 2006 07:30PM

Re: Partial answers *PIC*

J.B.Bane December 12, 2006 07:58PM

Re: Partial answers

Taylor Rush December 12, 2006 10:46PM

Re: Partial answers

Tom Moungovan December 15, 2006 09:32PM

Re: Partial answers

Dale Olsen December 13, 2006 01:22PM

Re: Partial answers

J.B.Bane December 13, 2006 03:25PM

Re: Partial answers

Taylor Rush December 13, 2006 09:12PM

Re: Partial answers *LINK*

dand December 23, 2006 07:52AM

Re: SV 2-6-6-2s - With and Without Tanks

LOGGERHOGGER December 13, 2006 07:53AM

Re: SV 2-6-6-2s

Mark S Bassett December 13, 2006 05:37PM

Re: SV 2-6-6-2s

Loggerhogger December 14, 2006 07:26AM

Re: SV 2-6-6-2s *PIC*

Loggerhogger December 14, 2006 07:28AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.