Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Stress on couplers

October 24, 2006 08:43PM
Charlie:
If you can find a copy of the April 1956 issue of Trains magazine, you will find an article titled "Into the Freezing Darkness" which describes a ride from Alamosa to Chama and return on a freight train. The helper was mid-train. Perhaps the following will add a bit more light...
D&RGW Colorado Divison Time-Table Number 7, dated June 1, 1967 reads:
Helper Locomotives Subdivisions 11, 12, and 12-B
17-D Unless otherwise provided, helper must be placed on head end of train.
From Chama to Cumbres, if one helper is used, place just ahead of caboose. If two helpers are used, place one on head end and one just ahead of caboose.
From Antonito to Cumbrs, if train consists of more than 1400 adjusted tons, helper must be cut into train.
17-E Helper locomotives must not be trained behind narrow gauge caboose.
17-F Doubleheading is prohibited on descending grade movements Cumbres to Alamosa, Cumbres to Chama, Chama to Gato, and MP 443 to Carbon Junction, except in show service when authorized.
17-G Locomotives must not be doubleheaded over Bridges 319.95 and 339.78, Subdivison 11, or Bridges 452.42 and 471.23 Subdivision 12-B, and must not be operated over these bridges unless separated by at least one hundred feet. This separation must consist of lightly loaded equipment. It is not permissible to operate two locomotives over these bridges with only a flanger between them.
Subject Author Posted

Chama Steam engine placement

John West October 23, 2006 08:59PM

Re: Chama Steam engine placement

Greg Scholl October 23, 2006 09:46PM

Re: Chama Steam engine placement

Les Jarrett October 24, 2006 12:59AM

Re: Chama Steam engine placement

John Craft October 24, 2006 06:21AM

Re: Chama Steam engine placement

Erik Freidrickson October 24, 2006 08:00AM

Re: Chama Steam engine placement

John Craft October 24, 2006 09:20AM

Re: Chama Steam engine placement

earl October 24, 2006 10:11AM

Re: Chama Steam engine placement

John West October 24, 2006 11:10AM

Re: Chama Steam engine placement

earl October 24, 2006 11:50AM

Re: Chama Steam engine placement

Nick Gully October 24, 2006 04:59PM

Re: Chama Steam engine placement

earl October 25, 2006 09:57AM

Re: Chama Steam engine placement

Jerry Day October 25, 2006 04:56PM

Re: Chama Steam engine placement

PRSL October 24, 2006 08:09AM

Re: Chama Steam engine placement *LINK* *PIC*

Greg Scholl October 24, 2006 08:44AM

Re: flanger

Randall Hess October 24, 2006 09:47AM

The rest of the consist

Rich Wisneski October 24, 2006 07:41PM

Re: Chama Steam engine placement *PIC*

Scott Turner October 24, 2006 10:04AM

Re: Chama Steam engine placement

Jerry Day October 24, 2006 10:28AM

Stress on couplers

Charlie McCandless October 24, 2006 05:23PM

Re: Stress on couplers

Greg Scholl October 24, 2006 07:04PM

Re: Stress on couplers

Jerry Day October 24, 2006 08:43PM

Re: Stress on couplers

Charlie McCandless October 24, 2006 09:21PM

Re: Stress on couplers

Jerry Day October 24, 2006 09:42PM

Re: Chama Steam engine placement

Kevin Bush October 24, 2006 05:44PM

Re: Chama Steam engine placement

Greg Scholl October 24, 2006 07:08PM

Re: Chama Steam engine placement

Jerry Day October 24, 2006 08:51PM

Re: Chama Steam engine placement

Greg Scholl October 25, 2006 07:00AM

Re: Chama Steam engine placement

earl October 25, 2006 10:07AM

Re: Chama Steam engine placement

rick b October 25, 2006 11:35AM

Re: Chama Steam engine placement

Dave Grandt October 25, 2006 02:05PM

Re: Chama Steam engine placement

Greg Scholl October 25, 2006 05:44PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.