Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Doghouse Removal on the "Silverton"

August 02, 2006 04:17PM
Ed, it was the D&RGW which did away with doghouses on the K-28's in 1964.
It was done to keep the head end brakemen in the train and not whiling away his time in the relative comfort and isolation afforded by the doghouse.
I imagine the doghouses on the 480's were removed by the D&S for two reasons. First, to restore the engines more to their original appearance, which is consistant with other changes the D&S made on the 470's. Secondly, they were in rapidly deteriorating condition, and would have required money to restore.
A third reason, of course, would have been the same as the D&RGW's logic in 1964. To keep the head end brakeman in the train.
Subject Author Posted

Number 9 in the late 30's *LINK*

William Reed July 31, 2006 01:01PM

Re: Number 9 in the late 30's

Derrell Poole July 31, 2006 01:28PM

Re: Number 9 in the late 30's

Mike Trent July 31, 2006 01:58PM

Re: Number 9 in the late 30's

Derrell Poole July 31, 2006 02:10PM

Re: Number 9 in the late 30's *LINK*

Mike Trent July 31, 2006 02:18PM

Re: Number 9 in the late 30's

Richard "Bo" Boulware July 31, 2006 03:05PM

Re: Number 9 in the late 30's

Mike Trent July 31, 2006 05:05PM

Re: Number 9 in the late 30's

Derrell Poole July 31, 2006 03:53PM

Re: Number 9 in the late 30's

Mike Trent July 31, 2006 05:14PM

Re: Number 9 in the late 30's

Derrell Poole July 31, 2006 06:11PM

Re: Number 9 in the late 30's

William Reed July 31, 2006 05:12PM

Re: Number 9 in the late 30's

Mike Trent July 31, 2006 05:20PM

Re: Number 9 in the late 30's

Greg Scholl August 01, 2006 03:03PM

Re: Number 9 in the late 30's

William Reed August 01, 2006 08:01PM

Re: Number 9 in the late 30's

Greg Scholl August 02, 2006 06:54AM

Re: Number 9 in the late 30's

William Reed August 02, 2006 03:25PM

Re: Number 9 in the late 30's

Ed Stabler August 02, 2006 03:54PM

Doghouse Removal on the "Silverton"

Mike Trent August 02, 2006 04:17PM

Re: Number 9 in the late 30's

Greg Scholl August 03, 2006 10:20AM

One more point to add

Greg Scholl August 03, 2006 10:24AM

Re: Number 9 a month later *PIC*

Ken Martin July 31, 2006 08:04PM

Re: Number 9 a month later

stuart olson August 01, 2006 12:52AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.