Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Hmmm....

June 25, 2005 02:38PM
Last night on public TV's "The News Hour", they interviewed some of the homeowners affected by this sort of condemnation proceedings. In one place in Ohio, condemnation was used to provide land for private development using a clause in their condemnation/eminent domain laws that allows condemnation if the area is question is "blighted". The definition of blighted and it's application was evidently highly subjective as the houses shown in the news clip were older, well kept small homes that in this area would be considered normal well kept middle class housing.
I think railroads being able to use eminent domain, is a fairly unique special case. No railroad could have been or could be built in the future without this ability in most cases. There are a lot of cases back in the old days where small towns and individuals tried to extort more money from a rr than what the land in question was worth. It's kinda funny when rr's ended up bypassing certain towns that tried this.
Subject Author Posted

Supreme Court ruling today could spell trouble!

Steve Stockham June 23, 2005 05:50PM

Re: Supreme Court ruling today could spell trouble

RBrinton June 23, 2005 06:02PM

Re: Supreme Court ruling today could spell trouble

J.B.Bane June 23, 2005 07:41PM

Re: Supreme Court ruling today could spell trouble

Douglas vV June 23, 2005 07:27PM

THe fight goes back to municipalities

El Coke June 24, 2005 10:24PM

Re: THe fight goes back to municipalities

Al Patterson June 25, 2005 08:04PM

110 year old hous vs. "ranchette"

El Coke June 27, 2005 07:52PM

Re: 110 year old hous vs. "ranchette"

Al Patterson June 27, 2005 09:15PM

Re: THe fight goes back to municipalities

Trevor Hartford June 25, 2005 08:35PM

Re: THe fight goes back to municipalities

Towne Comee June 27, 2005 08:24AM

Re: THe fight goes back to municipalities

Towne Comee June 27, 2005 08:25AM

Re: Supreme Court ruling today could spell trouble

Ed Stabler June 23, 2005 06:26PM

Re: Supreme Court ruling today could spell trouble

JasonL. June 23, 2005 06:48PM

Re: Supreme Court ruling today could spell trouble

Yosemite Sam June 24, 2005 08:33AM

Re: Supreme Court ruling today could spell trouble

Trevor Hartford June 25, 2005 08:47PM

Re: Steve, Ron . . .

John Craft June 24, 2005 06:08AM

Re: discussion on Kelo *LINK*

John Craft June 24, 2005 06:20AM

Thanks! That makes me feel better. *NM*

Steve Stockham June 24, 2005 06:52AM

This is a much needed clarification. Thanks. *NM*

Ed Stabler June 24, 2005 07:34AM

Damn Media Anyway

RBrinton June 24, 2005 07:31AM

Re: Damn Media Anyway

John Craft June 24, 2005 08:13AM

Burlington, VT

Bob Yarger June 24, 2005 12:28PM

Hmmm....

El Coke June 24, 2005 10:29PM

Re: Hmmm....

John Craft June 25, 2005 05:44AM

Re: Hmmm....

J.B.Bane June 25, 2005 02:38PM

SFNW Ry. vs Jemez Pueblo

El Coke June 25, 2005 02:57PM

Re: SFNW Ry. vs Jemez Pueblo

Dennis June 25, 2005 04:17PM

Re: Supreme Court ruling today could spell trouble

eric bracher June 23, 2005 06:41PM

Supreme Court ruling today WILL spell trouble!

Al Patterson June 23, 2005 08:12PM

Re: Supreme Court ruling today could spell trouble

Tom Leaton June 25, 2005 08:15PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.