Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: 492

May 16, 2005 11:12PM
Carlos is right as usual. However, once I got the hang of it I LOVED firing 497. It was the easiest engine to get back up to steam if you got a few pounds low. It took a special technique to get coal through the low door and to the front of the firebox (where it loved it). Some tall fireman had a very hard time stooping low enough to sling the coal properly.
497 was also hard on the engineer as the throttle tended to need a lot of force to move it and at least during one season the Johnson bar was so difficult to move it wanted to throw you out the front of the cab when you tried to drop it down a notch. I spent one afternoon switching cars in Chama with the 497 and my arms were SORE when I went home...Still, my favorite engine behind the 463.
Subject Author Posted

492

480 May 16, 2005 06:30PM

Re: 492

Carlos Llamas May 16, 2005 08:05PM

Re: 492

Dave Peterson May 16, 2005 11:12PM

Re: 492

Steve C May 17, 2005 08:05AM

Re: 492 *LINK*

Greg Scholl May 17, 2005 08:30AM

Re: 492

Earl May 17, 2005 01:52PM

Well said--they aren't bad engines. *NM*

William Reed May 18, 2005 08:04AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.