Re: False Advertising ? Not Likely

We really are reaching now;
‘what is on the cover is what people will expect to see when they ride."
Who invented this rule??
Besides, what the tourist sees on the cover is a picture of a old stream train and, IF Railstar can pull it off, this is just what the tourist will get to ride on. An old steam train.
I find it hard to believe that any tourist could tell that the train on the brochure is not the exact same train they will be riding. I also doubt if they would care even if they could tell.
It is also interesting to note that the D&SNG and Sumpter Valley also have vintage photos in their brochures. Are they guilty of false advertising as well? Sure, they are not on the cover but like I said above. SO WHAT?
Also, since the Railstar’s brochure is only one page, there is no way to have a picture on the inside.
Any tourist that may see this brochure card will see a "train ride" advertised. No false advertising there. Well, we hope so anyway. This descussion made more sense when we where talking about the spelling. That was the problem, not this. Like I said, you really seem to be reaching here.