Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

To 'steveb' *LINK* *PIC*

September 13, 2004 05:32PM
Mr. B,
Right you may be B, but even in the midst of typing your statement, you have got to realize the best of all options would be for cooler heads to prevail and for CHS to find agreeable middle ground with GLR. CHS seems to make the rules fit for their own purpose as they go, and it would be best for everybody, including Railstar, for CHS to reconsider.
It's hard to make the right calls when all the people are not being direct and straight, and the rules change constantly. If CHS would make the slightest compromise, I believe that GLR would anxiously return to work out an agreement. There could be such a simple win-win-win situation here, but this is about people not being mature enough to find a way to get along. If some of the individuals in this matter were to be removed from this equation, the pure logic sense of this would point towards finding a way to continue a continually improving operation, not starting over from scratch.
With a return to mutual agreement with GLR, CHS wouldn't have to ignite a few million dollars on fire to save their bacon. With a return to mutual agreement with GLR, CHS could spend the money they are spending now and have an exponentially better operation. With a return to mutual agreement, there would be no interruption in steam-train service. With a return to mutual agreement with GLR, CHS would be back with a known winner - a group that is known to be safe and reliable ... and FROM COLORADO!!! (It is the COLORADO Historical Society, is it not? - C(NY)HS?)
I don't know where you call home B, but I'm also upset that CHS has access to state education money that they intend to waste on this political hoo-ha. They have not managed things with regards to Loop projects in the past. Couple this with sourcing money from improper sources, and CHS should certainly be critiqued. CHS should be ashamed of this mess that they are clearly one-half of.
CHS may very well be successful, but they are doing it with a very sour and negative driving force. Their success will be a waste of big-bucks and their tasteless smiting of the operator that built this operation.
At the very very very least, CHS should be planning some sort of official THANK YOU to the past and current operators/staff of the Georgetown Loop. If they have no class and no good taste, they'll show no gracious appreciation. That right there B will show the true colors = lack of character and integrity of CHS.
More true colors to come next spring. Perhaps CHS will prove the logistics wrong and have a turn-key world class steam operation by next May like they proudly proclaim. Don't wager too much, B.
We will see.
20 days remain.
Subject Author Posted

Railstar's Proposal

Kerry Ann September 02, 2004 11:45AM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

Douglas vV September 02, 2004 12:24PM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

Stephen Peck September 02, 2004 12:58PM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

SZuiderveen September 02, 2004 02:37PM

Where's the train? *LINK*

Stephen Peck September 02, 2004 02:56PM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

John September 02, 2004 04:01PM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

Chris Webster September 02, 2004 09:54PM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

John Fisher September 03, 2004 09:52AM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

Jason Midyette September 02, 2004 07:22PM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

SZuiderveen September 02, 2004 07:46PM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

Stephen Peck September 02, 2004 08:19PM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

Randy Buchter September 02, 2004 09:20PM

Motive Power and Rolling Stock *LINK*

Jim Poston September 03, 2004 10:07AM

Re: Motive Power and Rolling Stock

Douglas vV September 03, 2004 10:53AM

Re: Motive Power and Rolling Stock

Fritz Klinke September 03, 2004 07:52PM

Re: Motive Power and Rolling Stock

Hobosteve September 13, 2004 08:20AM

Trashing Silver Plume Depot

Skip Luke September 04, 2004 12:46PM

Re: Trashing Silver Plume Depot

Steve Stockham September 05, 2004 08:46AM

You Can Respond *LINK*

Jim Poston September 05, 2004 10:56AM

Question...

Taylor Rush September 06, 2004 12:24AM

Re: Question...

Steve Stockham September 06, 2004 07:26AM

Re: And Another Question...

M. Peterson September 06, 2004 08:40AM

Re: And Another Question...

Wooly September 06, 2004 08:50AM

Re: And Another Question...

Wooly September 06, 2004 08:54AM

Re: Question...

South Park September 06, 2004 10:17AM

History & Concessions

roger hogan September 06, 2004 12:39PM

Re: Trashing Silver Plume Depot

Rick Steele September 05, 2004 12:29PM

Re: Trashing Silver Plume Depot

Fritz Klinke September 05, 2004 09:20PM

Re: Trashing Depot - Fritz v Rick

Ken Graczyk September 05, 2004 09:38PM

Re: Trashing Depot - Fritz v Rick

Fritz Klinke September 06, 2004 04:02AM

Re: Trashing Depot - Fritz v Rick

Rick Steele September 06, 2004 08:09PM

extemporaneously? *LINK* *PIC*

Stephen Peck September 06, 2004 08:23PM

Re: extemporaneously?

Rick Steele September 06, 2004 08:36PM

Re: extemporaneously?

Skip Luke September 07, 2004 09:41AM

Trash

Stephen Peck September 06, 2004 04:46AM

Re: Trashing Silver Plume Depot

Skip September 05, 2004 10:02PM

Re: Trashing Silver Plume Depot

Fritz Klinke September 06, 2004 04:17AM

GLR, Inc. wants to stay. *PIC*

Stephen Peck September 06, 2004 07:18AM

Re: GLR, Inc. wants to stay.

Michael Allen September 06, 2004 09:12AM

Re: GLR, Inc. wants to stay.

J September 06, 2004 09:34PM

Blew it big time? Slow down there, Ace...

Natasha Bettis September 06, 2004 11:15PM

Re: Blew it big time? Slow down there, Ace...

Robert September 07, 2004 07:02AM

Re: Blew it big time? Slow down there, Ace...

Don Richter September 07, 2004 08:12AM

Thanks for the ride yesterday

Scott Hightower September 07, 2004 08:55AM

Re: Thanks for the ride yesterday

Natasha Bettis September 07, 2004 06:12PM

Re: Thanks for the ride yesterday

Scott Hightower September 08, 2004 09:12AM

Re: GLR, Inc. wants to stay.

Skip Luke September 07, 2004 09:44AM

Re: GLR, Inc. wants to stay.

Steve Stockham September 06, 2004 09:24AM

Re: GLR, Inc. wants to stay. *PIC*

Don Richter September 06, 2004 09:40AM

Re: GLR, Inc. wants to stay.

Douglas vV September 06, 2004 10:36AM

Re: GLR, Inc. wants to stay.

Wooly September 06, 2004 12:33PM

Re: GLR, Inc. wants to stay.

Don Richter September 06, 2004 02:15PM

Re: GLR, Inc. wants to stay.

Steve Stockham September 06, 2004 03:13PM

#30 is not a problem.

Chris Weaver September 06, 2004 10:31PM

Re: #30 is not a problem.

Steve Stockham September 08, 2004 12:40PM

Re: GLR, Inc. wants to stay.

Rick Steele September 06, 2004 08:18PM

Re: GLR, Inc. wants to stay.---CHS accounting prob

Andy Roth September 07, 2004 01:26PM

Re: mudslinging

Skip Luke September 06, 2004 07:42PM

Sad but true...... *NM*

Skip September 05, 2004 09:48PM

Re: Trashing Silver Plume Depot

Roger Mitchell September 06, 2004 06:40PM

Re: Trashing Silver Plume Depot

Rick Steele September 06, 2004 08:24PM

Re: Central City mines

Skip Luke September 07, 2004 09:58AM

Re: Central City mines

Rick Steele September 07, 2004 10:52AM

Re: Central City mines

Skip Luke September 07, 2004 11:05AM

Re: Central City mines

Rick Steele September 07, 2004 03:58PM

Re: Central City mines

Skip Luke September 07, 2004 06:42PM

Re: Central City mines

Dan September 07, 2004 06:26PM

Re: Trashing Silver Plume Depot *LINK*

Gregory Raven September 06, 2004 09:38PM

Plume Telegraph *LINK* *PIC*

Stephen Peck September 06, 2004 09:59PM

Re: Plume Telegraph

Tim Schreiner September 06, 2004 10:26PM

Re: Plume Telegraph

Robert September 07, 2004 06:53AM

Re: Plume Telegraph

Skip Luke September 07, 2004 10:11AM

Re: Plume Telegraph

Rick Steele September 07, 2004 10:55AM

Soda...

Taylor Rush September 07, 2004 12:12PM

Re: Soda...

Skip Luke September 07, 2004 06:46PM

Re: Soda...

Taylor Rush September 07, 2004 09:24PM

Re: SV tgh gear ....

Skip Luke September 07, 2004 10:05AM

Re: Trashing Silver Plume Depot

Olaf the Red September 07, 2004 04:26PM

Re: Shays at Silver Plume

Skip Luke September 07, 2004 06:50PM

Re: Trashing Silver Plume Depot

Steve Stockham September 10, 2004 06:30AM

Re: Trashing Silver Plume Depot

Ed Kelley September 11, 2004 12:28PM

Re: Trashing Silver Plume Depot

Paul Hagglund September 11, 2004 01:11PM

Re: Trashing Silver Plume Depot

Olaf the Red September 13, 2004 07:48AM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

Kerry Ann September 05, 2004 01:00PM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

John September 05, 2004 07:37PM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

Chris Webster September 05, 2004 08:47PM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

Skip September 05, 2004 09:58PM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

Kerry Ann September 05, 2004 10:01PM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

John September 06, 2004 08:32AM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

Kerry Ann September 06, 2004 01:57AM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

Watching in Chama September 07, 2004 06:53PM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

Mike Trent September 13, 2004 10:37AM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

steveb September 13, 2004 02:52PM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

Mike Trent September 13, 2004 03:07PM

To 'steveb' *LINK*

Jim Poston September 13, 2004 03:12PM

Re: To 'steveb'

steveb September 13, 2004 03:29PM

Re: To 'steveb'

Tim Schreiner September 13, 2004 05:11PM

Re: To 'steveb'

Wooly September 13, 2004 05:23PM

To 'steveb' *LINK* *PIC*

Stephen Peck September 13, 2004 05:32PM

Re: To 'steveb'

Steve Stockham September 13, 2004 06:10PM

Re: To 'steveb'

Michael Allen September 13, 2004 06:33PM

Re: To 'steveb'

Wooly September 13, 2004 08:09PM

Re: To 'steveb' *LINK*

Robert September 14, 2004 08:33AM

Motives

Don Richter September 14, 2004 08:42AM

Re: 'steveb' ?? really ...

Skip Luke September 14, 2004 11:25AM

Re: 'steveb' ?? really ...

Karasu September 15, 2004 10:36AM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

John September 13, 2004 08:07PM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

Wooly September 13, 2004 08:12PM

20 days *LINK* *PIC*

Stephen Peck September 13, 2004 09:25PM

Re: 20 days

Craig LeVay September 14, 2004 04:08AM

Danger Ahead - Historic Railway Disasters *LINK*

Stephen Peck September 14, 2004 09:59AM

Re: Danger Ahead - Historic Railway Disasters

sboothr1@earthlink.net September 14, 2004 05:56PM

Re: Danger Ahead - Historic Railway Disasters

Kerry Ann September 14, 2004 06:25PM

sorry about that

Stephen Peck September 14, 2004 06:39PM

Re: 20 days

John September 14, 2004 07:48AM

Re: 20 days

Kerry Ann September 14, 2004 09:18AM

Re: 20 days

John September 14, 2004 02:12PM

Re: 20 days

Skip Luke September 14, 2004 04:55PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.