Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Trashing Silver Plume Depot

Ed Kelley
September 11, 2004 12:28PM
Arnold-
I know you don't care for Shays. A lot of people I know down me for liking them...especially diesel-folk. People must understand that (aside from the fact I, or we, think they're beautiful unique engines) they were built to serve a purpose. Chessie 614 couldn't make tight curves and 8+ percent grades. They were built for logging and did it well. Ironically, many people never even saw Shays before the 1960s tourist-railroad boom because they were isolated in the forests where few people ever saw them.
As for Railstar-the Belfast & Moosehead as mentioned has only been owned by them for 2 or so years. The previous operators brought in the Swedish dismal that runs there. The Davenport #16 at Erie Canal Village is a real Davenport; however it was heavily 'disneyized" by Mr. Willock being that it was originally a saddle-tank locomotive just like the Porter (now 2-4-0) counterpart also in the collection. However, it is still a Davenport, and Erie Canal Village is not an amusement park at all. Do you see a ferris wheel, a carousel, and a egg-scrambler? Its a living history museum similar to the San Jose Historical Museum which I was a frequent visitor to; they didn't have a steam railroad, but they had historic trolleys which were for many years a fixture to San Jose. A neat 2' gauge 'park train' (owned by the amusement park next door, but an equally interesting establishment) took passengers from a station at the outside gates to the museum, that didn't change its status. The historic buildings were relocated or replicated and put into a historical park such as the Village. I haven't been to Rome, but plan to go eventually.
Should I take a poll here of who would go out of their way to go to Georgetown to ride a European 'deezul' over the loop with its honky horn, fumes, and noise?? If only a nearby line could be used for direct competition over this...like Central City <img class=" />...too bad it was built over.
If you want to go historical; then the #71, #60, and #9 would be the only things really close to historic for use on the Loop. The grades give the Shays a good workout. Though I'd love to see them back on the West Side...the only way that would happen is if the GLR owners got involved with that project...very unlikely. I always thought the #8 if never used again, or the #2 Heisler, would make a nice display addition for the MORT or whatever its called now in Sacramento when built. They've got industrial locomotives such as the old Homestake engine from the BJWRR as well as the CP #233 which was a suburban commute engine in Oakland. A West-Side (or Pickering) geared engine would really add to this place when finally built.
Worst Case Scenario: A Swedish steam locomotive and German diesels on the Devils Gate viaduct with tweety one-noe whistles and horns. Not a pretty sight.
Unfortunately I'll never have gotten to seen what WAS at the Loop. I wish I did. Some friends of ours went way out of the way just for a last ride behind one of the Shays.
Any word on the #346 at the CRRM and the storage arrangements there for the GLR equipment?
Keep Steaming,
Ed Kelley
Subject Author Posted

Railstar's Proposal

Kerry Ann September 02, 2004 11:45AM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

Douglas vV September 02, 2004 12:24PM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

Stephen Peck September 02, 2004 12:58PM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

SZuiderveen September 02, 2004 02:37PM

Where's the train? *LINK*

Stephen Peck September 02, 2004 02:56PM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

John September 02, 2004 04:01PM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

Chris Webster September 02, 2004 09:54PM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

John Fisher September 03, 2004 09:52AM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

Jason Midyette September 02, 2004 07:22PM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

SZuiderveen September 02, 2004 07:46PM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

Stephen Peck September 02, 2004 08:19PM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

Randy Buchter September 02, 2004 09:20PM

Motive Power and Rolling Stock *LINK*

Jim Poston September 03, 2004 10:07AM

Re: Motive Power and Rolling Stock

Douglas vV September 03, 2004 10:53AM

Re: Motive Power and Rolling Stock

Fritz Klinke September 03, 2004 07:52PM

Re: Motive Power and Rolling Stock

Hobosteve September 13, 2004 08:20AM

Trashing Silver Plume Depot

Skip Luke September 04, 2004 12:46PM

Re: Trashing Silver Plume Depot

Steve Stockham September 05, 2004 08:46AM

You Can Respond *LINK*

Jim Poston September 05, 2004 10:56AM

Question...

Taylor Rush September 06, 2004 12:24AM

Re: Question...

Steve Stockham September 06, 2004 07:26AM

Re: And Another Question...

M. Peterson September 06, 2004 08:40AM

Re: And Another Question...

Wooly September 06, 2004 08:50AM

Re: And Another Question...

Wooly September 06, 2004 08:54AM

Re: Question...

South Park September 06, 2004 10:17AM

History & Concessions

roger hogan September 06, 2004 12:39PM

Re: Trashing Silver Plume Depot

Rick Steele September 05, 2004 12:29PM

Re: Trashing Silver Plume Depot

Fritz Klinke September 05, 2004 09:20PM

Re: Trashing Depot - Fritz v Rick

Ken Graczyk September 05, 2004 09:38PM

Re: Trashing Depot - Fritz v Rick

Fritz Klinke September 06, 2004 04:02AM

Re: Trashing Depot - Fritz v Rick

Rick Steele September 06, 2004 08:09PM

extemporaneously? *LINK* *PIC*

Stephen Peck September 06, 2004 08:23PM

Re: extemporaneously?

Rick Steele September 06, 2004 08:36PM

Re: extemporaneously?

Skip Luke September 07, 2004 09:41AM

Trash

Stephen Peck September 06, 2004 04:46AM

Re: Trashing Silver Plume Depot

Skip September 05, 2004 10:02PM

Re: Trashing Silver Plume Depot

Fritz Klinke September 06, 2004 04:17AM

GLR, Inc. wants to stay. *PIC*

Stephen Peck September 06, 2004 07:18AM

Re: GLR, Inc. wants to stay.

Michael Allen September 06, 2004 09:12AM

Re: GLR, Inc. wants to stay.

J September 06, 2004 09:34PM

Blew it big time? Slow down there, Ace...

Natasha Bettis September 06, 2004 11:15PM

Re: Blew it big time? Slow down there, Ace...

Robert September 07, 2004 07:02AM

Re: Blew it big time? Slow down there, Ace...

Don Richter September 07, 2004 08:12AM

Thanks for the ride yesterday

Scott Hightower September 07, 2004 08:55AM

Re: Thanks for the ride yesterday

Natasha Bettis September 07, 2004 06:12PM

Re: Thanks for the ride yesterday

Scott Hightower September 08, 2004 09:12AM

Re: GLR, Inc. wants to stay.

Skip Luke September 07, 2004 09:44AM

Re: GLR, Inc. wants to stay.

Steve Stockham September 06, 2004 09:24AM

Re: GLR, Inc. wants to stay. *PIC*

Don Richter September 06, 2004 09:40AM

Re: GLR, Inc. wants to stay.

Douglas vV September 06, 2004 10:36AM

Re: GLR, Inc. wants to stay.

Wooly September 06, 2004 12:33PM

Re: GLR, Inc. wants to stay.

Don Richter September 06, 2004 02:15PM

Re: GLR, Inc. wants to stay.

Steve Stockham September 06, 2004 03:13PM

#30 is not a problem.

Chris Weaver September 06, 2004 10:31PM

Re: #30 is not a problem.

Steve Stockham September 08, 2004 12:40PM

Re: GLR, Inc. wants to stay.

Rick Steele September 06, 2004 08:18PM

Re: GLR, Inc. wants to stay.---CHS accounting prob

Andy Roth September 07, 2004 01:26PM

Re: mudslinging

Skip Luke September 06, 2004 07:42PM

Sad but true...... *NM*

Skip September 05, 2004 09:48PM

Re: Trashing Silver Plume Depot

Roger Mitchell September 06, 2004 06:40PM

Re: Trashing Silver Plume Depot

Rick Steele September 06, 2004 08:24PM

Re: Central City mines

Skip Luke September 07, 2004 09:58AM

Re: Central City mines

Rick Steele September 07, 2004 10:52AM

Re: Central City mines

Skip Luke September 07, 2004 11:05AM

Re: Central City mines

Rick Steele September 07, 2004 03:58PM

Re: Central City mines

Skip Luke September 07, 2004 06:42PM

Re: Central City mines

Dan September 07, 2004 06:26PM

Re: Trashing Silver Plume Depot *LINK*

Gregory Raven September 06, 2004 09:38PM

Plume Telegraph *LINK* *PIC*

Stephen Peck September 06, 2004 09:59PM

Re: Plume Telegraph

Tim Schreiner September 06, 2004 10:26PM

Re: Plume Telegraph

Robert September 07, 2004 06:53AM

Re: Plume Telegraph

Skip Luke September 07, 2004 10:11AM

Re: Plume Telegraph

Rick Steele September 07, 2004 10:55AM

Soda...

Taylor Rush September 07, 2004 12:12PM

Re: Soda...

Skip Luke September 07, 2004 06:46PM

Re: Soda...

Taylor Rush September 07, 2004 09:24PM

Re: SV tgh gear ....

Skip Luke September 07, 2004 10:05AM

Re: Trashing Silver Plume Depot

Olaf the Red September 07, 2004 04:26PM

Re: Shays at Silver Plume

Skip Luke September 07, 2004 06:50PM

Re: Trashing Silver Plume Depot

Steve Stockham September 10, 2004 06:30AM

Re: Trashing Silver Plume Depot

Ed Kelley September 11, 2004 12:28PM

Re: Trashing Silver Plume Depot

Paul Hagglund September 11, 2004 01:11PM

Re: Trashing Silver Plume Depot

Olaf the Red September 13, 2004 07:48AM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

Kerry Ann September 05, 2004 01:00PM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

John September 05, 2004 07:37PM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

Chris Webster September 05, 2004 08:47PM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

Skip September 05, 2004 09:58PM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

Kerry Ann September 05, 2004 10:01PM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

John September 06, 2004 08:32AM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

Kerry Ann September 06, 2004 01:57AM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

Watching in Chama September 07, 2004 06:53PM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

Mike Trent September 13, 2004 10:37AM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

steveb September 13, 2004 02:52PM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

Mike Trent September 13, 2004 03:07PM

To 'steveb' *LINK*

Jim Poston September 13, 2004 03:12PM

Re: To 'steveb'

steveb September 13, 2004 03:29PM

Re: To 'steveb'

Tim Schreiner September 13, 2004 05:11PM

Re: To 'steveb'

Wooly September 13, 2004 05:23PM

To 'steveb' *LINK* *PIC*

Stephen Peck September 13, 2004 05:32PM

Re: To 'steveb'

Steve Stockham September 13, 2004 06:10PM

Re: To 'steveb'

Michael Allen September 13, 2004 06:33PM

Re: To 'steveb'

Wooly September 13, 2004 08:09PM

Re: To 'steveb' *LINK*

Robert September 14, 2004 08:33AM

Motives

Don Richter September 14, 2004 08:42AM

Re: 'steveb' ?? really ...

Skip Luke September 14, 2004 11:25AM

Re: 'steveb' ?? really ...

Karasu September 15, 2004 10:36AM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

John September 13, 2004 08:07PM

Re: Railstar's Proposal

Wooly September 13, 2004 08:12PM

20 days *LINK* *PIC*

Stephen Peck September 13, 2004 09:25PM

Re: 20 days

Craig LeVay September 14, 2004 04:08AM

Danger Ahead - Historic Railway Disasters *LINK*

Stephen Peck September 14, 2004 09:59AM

Re: Danger Ahead - Historic Railway Disasters

sboothr1@earthlink.net September 14, 2004 05:56PM

Re: Danger Ahead - Historic Railway Disasters

Kerry Ann September 14, 2004 06:25PM

sorry about that

Stephen Peck September 14, 2004 06:39PM

Re: 20 days

John September 14, 2004 07:48AM

Re: 20 days

Kerry Ann September 14, 2004 09:18AM

Re: 20 days

John September 14, 2004 02:12PM

Re: 20 days

Skip Luke September 14, 2004 04:55PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.