rod5nz Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I will comment. I am very disappointed that they
> are converting another engine to oil. I don't see
> the need for it given the upgrades to the coal
> burner smoke boxes. The 489 still started a fire
> despite being an oil burner, which was thankfully
> extinguished by fire patrol. I wish they would
> just do what they always have done. Continue
> effective fire suppression and leave history
> alone. It's just sad really. I'm glad I have a
> lot of pictures and videos of "the good ole days".
I agree with you "I don't see the need for it given the upgrades to the coal burner smoke boxes."
BUT = It is not you and I or any of us here that will make the decision.
I am being told it will be the Forest Services that are involved and the insurance company and the railroad that will make the decisions.