Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: 103 this week

January 28, 2022 03:42PM avatar
Yes, I'm quite familiar with the concept as I am on train operating crew with a tourist railroad, as a brakeman.
It's generally not a good idea to say NO employee ever said "______," because you'll likely be proven wrong at some point.


Casey S. Carlson Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lee,
>
> Sometimes those of us that work on
> locomotives/railroads will use (for lack of a
> better description) "foamer" terminology,
> depending on who we're talking to. That could
> explain what you heard on the platform. While I've
> never worked for the WP&YR, I certainly have
> talked with a lot of guys who worked up there and
> can vouch for John's comments regarding those
> units being called either "90's" or "101's",
> particularly when enginemen are talking amongst
> themselves.
>
> Casey

-Lee

Flickr photo set of my On30 layout
Subject Author Posted

103 this week Attachments

John C January 25, 2022 06:43PM

Re: 103 this week

WilliamDiehl January 25, 2022 08:22PM

Other DL -535 status?

slrg1744 January 26, 2022 09:07AM

Re: Other DL -535 status?

Joe Weigman January 26, 2022 09:23AM

Re: Other DL -535 status?

gregcoit January 26, 2022 06:03PM

Re: Other DL -535 status?

Carl T. Henderson January 28, 2022 07:58PM

Re: paint scheme? -- wait and find out

Brian Norden January 29, 2022 12:36PM

Re: 103 this week

Kelly Anderson January 26, 2022 09:26AM

Re: 103 this week

John C January 26, 2022 10:03PM

Re: 103 this week

John C January 27, 2022 05:19PM

Re: 103 this week

et&wnc January 28, 2022 11:04AM

Re: 103 this week

Casey S. Carlson January 28, 2022 12:37PM

Re: 103 this week

et&wnc January 28, 2022 03:42PM

Re: 103 this week

et&wnc January 27, 2022 10:09AM

Re: 103 this week

John C January 28, 2022 04:31PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login