Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: 482 trade

Fred Garvin M. P.
April 13, 2004 05:05PM
The trade illustrates lack of foresight to me.
Many times in my life I have seen that taking the easy way out frequently results in sorrow later. True the trade looked good at the time (I guess since I wasn't involved) but it has been stated before that there was something wrong with the suspension of the 497 and as a result whe was hard on track. why did the D&S want to trade her off? The notion that she was too large for the Silverton run really doesn't wash. A K-36 is only 200 pounds lighter and the running gear is very similar. Beware of a really great deal that looks too good to be true, because in reality it usually is too good to be true.
Subject Author Posted

C&TS Rolling Stock Roster Version 3 *LINK*

Curt Bianchi April 12, 2004 11:29PM

Re: C&TS Rolling Stock Roster Version 3

John Frank April 13, 2004 08:29AM

Re: C&TS Rolling Stock Roster Version 3

Curt Bianchi April 13, 2004 09:38AM

Re: C&TS Rolling Stock Roster Version 3

Rob Lenicheck April 13, 2004 12:37PM

Re: C&TS Rolling Stock Roster Version 3

John Sporseen April 13, 2004 01:50PM

Re: C&TS Rolling Stock Roster Version 3

Mike Stillwell April 13, 2004 02:32PM

Re: C&TS Rolling Stock Roster Version 3

John Sporseen April 13, 2004 02:46PM

492 work...

Kevin Cook April 13, 2004 03:39PM

482 trade

Fred Garvin M. P. April 13, 2004 04:01PM

Re: 482 trade *LINK*

John Kelly (K-36 487) April 13, 2004 04:39PM

Re: 482 trade

Kevin Cook April 13, 2004 04:54PM

Re: 482 trade

Fred Garvin M. P. April 13, 2004 05:05PM

Re: 482 trade

Douglas vV April 13, 2004 06:52PM

Re: 482 trade

Paul Hagglund April 23, 2004 08:49PM

Boxcar 3216

Curt Bianchi April 13, 2004 09:40AM

Re: Boxcar 3216

Dave Dye April 13, 2004 08:54PM

Re: C&TS Rolling Stock Roster Version 3

Les Clark April 13, 2004 05:15PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.