Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: 482 trade *LINK*

April 13, 2004 04:39PM
No, the D&S probably wouldn't trade back...
1.) The 497 was just too big of an engine to run on the sharp curves en route to Silverton.
2.) Also, the 497 is not operational currently, and 482 is. (except that it's badly out of time! <img class=" /> )
John
Future C&TS or D&S Engineer
Subject Author Posted

C&TS Rolling Stock Roster Version 3 *LINK*

Curt Bianchi April 12, 2004 11:29PM

Re: C&TS Rolling Stock Roster Version 3

John Frank April 13, 2004 08:29AM

Re: C&TS Rolling Stock Roster Version 3

Curt Bianchi April 13, 2004 09:38AM

Re: C&TS Rolling Stock Roster Version 3

Rob Lenicheck April 13, 2004 12:37PM

Re: C&TS Rolling Stock Roster Version 3

John Sporseen April 13, 2004 01:50PM

Re: C&TS Rolling Stock Roster Version 3

Mike Stillwell April 13, 2004 02:32PM

Re: C&TS Rolling Stock Roster Version 3

John Sporseen April 13, 2004 02:46PM

492 work...

Kevin Cook April 13, 2004 03:39PM

482 trade

Fred Garvin M. P. April 13, 2004 04:01PM

Re: 482 trade *LINK*

John Kelly (K-36 487) April 13, 2004 04:39PM

Re: 482 trade

Kevin Cook April 13, 2004 04:54PM

Re: 482 trade

Fred Garvin M. P. April 13, 2004 05:05PM

Re: 482 trade

Douglas vV April 13, 2004 06:52PM

Re: 482 trade

Paul Hagglund April 23, 2004 08:49PM

Boxcar 3216

Curt Bianchi April 13, 2004 09:40AM

Re: Boxcar 3216

Dave Dye April 13, 2004 08:54PM

Re: C&TS Rolling Stock Roster Version 3

Les Clark April 13, 2004 05:15PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.