Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: C&TS National Scenic Designation

March 16, 2004 11:53AM
The catch being "federal involvement." Any federal money spent, even pass through money in the form of grants administered by states or local entities, triggers a Section 106 review to determine if the proposed federally funded action endangers or alters the National Historic Landmark status. This is usually determined by the SHPO, and it is about the only way local interests can be heard. This is a delaying tactic, as after 6 months, the proposed action can continue anyway. We used it to get a better post office design for Silverton when a double-wide trailer was proposed. The 106 reviews don't automatically happen, so usually someone affected by the action has to be on their toes and call this review into action. And often the SHPO will contact someone locally to find out what the proposed action is all about, so it is important to know your state SHPO and let them know that there are interested people or groups in a community who care about historic preservation. In our case, it is our local historical society.
Subject Author Posted

C&TS National Scenic Designation

Fritz Klinke March 15, 2004 09:29AM

Re: C&TS National Scenic Designation

John Craft March 15, 2004 09:54AM

Re: C&TS National Scenic Designation

Fritz Klinke March 15, 2004 10:37AM

Re: C&TS National Scenic Designation *LINK*

Randy Hees March 15, 2004 11:19AM

Re: C&TS National Scenic Designation

Fritz Klinke March 15, 2004 12:26PM

Re: C&TS National Scenic Designation *LINK*

John Craft March 16, 2004 05:01AM

National Register example *PIC*

Fred T March 16, 2004 07:16AM

Re: C&TS National Scenic Designation

Fritz Klinke March 16, 2004 11:53AM

Re: C&TS National Scenic Designation

Edgar G. Lowrance March 15, 2004 05:20PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.