Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: The Monarch Branch, and stock car questions.

February 19, 2004 09:22PM
Hi Kev....
The Monarch Branch had a ruling grade of 4.5% from Maysville to Monarch - hence the lower tonnage rating.
Some railroads did show tonnage ratings at "a reasonable speed", but I don't think the D&RGW cared how slow you went as long as you got the longest, heaviest train possible over the road. If you apply the Cole formulas (which are used to determine how much tractive effort is required to move "X" amount of tonnage up "Y"% of grade around "Z" degrees of curvature. You find the published tonnage ratings higher. This means the steepest grade does not occur around the sharpest curve. But, again we are talking the ability to move a train (tractive effort) versus the ability to take that train and run it at speed (horsepower).
The double deck cars were primarily used for moving sheep (or REAL short cows?). In addition to the 30' cars, there was a class of 34' stock cars. The 34' cars are all gone, except for a recently discovered body. The 34' cars had Andrews trucks which were needed for the 6600 flats that were made from cut down SG cars.
Subject Author Posted

The Monarch Branch, and stock car questions.

Kevin Bush February 19, 2004 07:46PM

Re: The Monarch Branch, and stock car questions.

Earl February 19, 2004 09:22PM

Pigs too

Kevin Cook February 21, 2004 02:15AM

Thanks Earl, Tom, and Kevin. *NM*

Kevin Bush February 21, 2004 10:10AM

Re: The Monarch Branch, and stock car questions.

Tom Farmer February 19, 2004 09:23PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.