Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Note to FOCT members

January 24, 2004 07:44AM
This is an interesting situation, but I suspect that there is a lot more to this than we see on the list. Or perhaps need to see on the list.
However, it seems to me that the Friends group has had some kind of recognition from different managers for a number of years, and that the Friends are supposed to be working on projects approved by the railroad's management and the commission. If that is the case, then their presence on the property is like a contractor performing work for the railroad, is it not? That does not make them the management, but it does give them some authority to be where they are, and performing work which has been approved of by the railroad.
I suppose it is possible that members of the Friends, like members of the public, can presume that their membership in the Friends, or their voting status (i.e. citizen of NM etc) gives them a right to unlimited free access to the entire property. As I've argued elsewhere, I don't think that anyone has a right to unlimited free access.
The management should be able to make decisions with the interest of safety for employes, contractors, and the public in mind, and enforce those decisions. Those of us who don't actually have work to do on the property can be more understanding of the needs fo the men doing the work, and not make a nuisance of ourselves.
Again, I'm not trying to be argumentative, but it seems to me that the C&TS management has tried very hard to offer the public (including us enthusiasts) more acces than most railroads. I think the terms of access are much more restrictive at other railroads running steam. Let us be thankful for what whe have, and not make things more difficult for the C&TS staff, which has plenty on their plates right now.
Thanks for reading.
Charlie Mutschler
-30-
Subject Author Posted

Have there been injuries to the public?

Tom Stewart January 19, 2004 02:34PM

Re: open access?

John Craft January 19, 2004 03:27PM

Re: open access?

Tom Stewart January 19, 2004 03:45PM

Re: open access?

John Craft January 19, 2004 04:34PM

Re: open access?

dan January 19, 2004 05:01PM

Re: open access?

John Craft January 19, 2004 05:30PM

Re: open access?

dan January 19, 2004 05:48PM

Re: open access?

jbbane January 19, 2004 07:30PM

Re: open access? *LINK*

Kelly January 20, 2004 05:49AM

public viewing

Douglas van Veelen January 19, 2004 05:53PM

Shop Access

roger hogan January 19, 2004 06:10PM

Re: Shop Access

Charlie Mutschler January 19, 2004 07:52PM

Re: Shop Access

E.D.Martin January 23, 2004 06:42AM

Re: Shop Access *LINK*

John Craft January 23, 2004 07:17AM

Re: Shop Access

E.D.Martin January 23, 2004 08:10AM

Chama Dot Com

roger hogan January 23, 2004 08:39AM

Re: Shop Access

John Craft January 23, 2004 10:52AM

Re: Shop Access

rick b January 24, 2004 01:59PM

Are going to pay?????? *LINK*

roger hogan January 24, 2004 02:37PM

Re: Are going to pay??????

rick b January 25, 2004 01:19AM

Re: Are going to pay??????

Don Richter January 25, 2004 10:07AM

Re: Are going to pay??????

E.D.Martin January 26, 2004 09:52AM

Thanks JAC

roger hogan January 23, 2004 08:42AM

C&TS shop work site.

Douglas vV January 23, 2004 10:43AM

Re: Shop Access

Jim Armstrong January 23, 2004 07:42PM

You need to ask Carlos

roger hogan January 23, 2004 08:36AM

Re: public viewing

Jerry Huck January 19, 2004 07:58PM

Re: public viewing *LINK*

Smitty January 19, 2004 08:54PM

Re: I don't know......

Jerry Huck January 19, 2004 09:07PM

Re: public viewing

Taylor Rush January 19, 2004 09:11PM

Re: public viewing

Smitty January 20, 2004 08:51AM

Re: public viewing

Douglas van Veelen January 19, 2004 08:58PM

Re: public viewing

Brian Norden January 19, 2004 10:38PM

Re: public viewing

G. W. Laepple January 20, 2004 03:17PM

Re: public viewing

Dick January 20, 2004 06:07PM

Re: open access?

Dick Seelye January 22, 2004 11:38PM

"our turf"

Dave Bates January 23, 2004 07:57AM

Re: "our turf"

Don Richter January 23, 2004 09:47AM

Re: "our turf"

Charlie Mutschler January 23, 2004 11:14AM

Re: "our turf"

Douglas vV January 23, 2004 12:54PM

Re: "our turf"

rick b January 24, 2004 01:29AM

Re: "our turf"

John Cole January 24, 2004 07:56AM

Re: "our turf" *LINK*

Bill Kepner January 24, 2004 08:58AM

Re: "our turf"

rick b January 24, 2004 01:44PM

Re: "our turf"

Bill Kepner January 24, 2004 02:16PM

Re: "our turf"

John Cole January 24, 2004 02:43PM

Re: "our turf"

Les Clark January 24, 2004 07:43PM

Re: "our turf"

rick b January 25, 2004 01:07AM

Re: "our turf"

Bill Kepner January 25, 2004 07:41AM

Re: "our turf"

RichB January 25, 2004 03:40PM

Note to FOCT members

El Coke January 23, 2004 09:32PM

Re: Note to FOCT members

Charlie Mutschler January 24, 2004 07:44AM

Re: Note to FOCT members

Bill Kepner January 24, 2004 07:45AM

Re: Note to FOCT members

Charlie Mutschler January 24, 2004 08:22AM

Re: Have there been injuries to the public?

Rick Steele January 21, 2004 10:22AM

Re: Have there been injuries to the public?

Mike Ramsey January 21, 2004 04:30PM

Re: Have there been injuries to the public?

Tom Stewart January 22, 2004 07:46PM

Injury tales

El Coke January 23, 2004 08:51AM

Re: Injury tales

Charlie Mutschler January 23, 2004 10:52AM

Re: Injury tales

Mark Valerius January 23, 2004 11:59AM

Re: Injury tales

Dale Brown January 23, 2004 12:01PM

WP&Y fatalities

El Coke January 23, 2004 03:36PM

Re: WP&Y fatalities *LINK*

Dale Brown January 23, 2004 10:42PM

Re: Gettysburg...

Gavin Hamilton January 24, 2004 03:12AM

Re: Injury tales

WP&Ymike January 24, 2004 01:58PM

Re: Injury tales

Rick Steele January 26, 2004 08:53AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.