guymonmd Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why were (and are) the diamond stacks that the
> D&RGW put on the k-28's so hated?
Herb Kelsey Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The lunacy of trying to make a 1923 locomotive
> look like an 1880 locomotive was I think the
> driving force for the diamond-stack-hatred thing.
> That and the fact that the tall straight stack was
> a critical aesthetic component of the whole "sport
> model" designation (a 1920's "23 Skidoo," top-
> down-roadster kind of thing) for these engines.
> Aesthetically, the fat clunky diamond stack
> destroyed that whole "sport model" look.
Way to hit the nail on its loony head, Herb — æsthetically speaking, that is.
John West Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> About all I can add to Herb's comment is the
> lunacy part was because it was so obviously fake.
> But remember the audience at the time was poppy
> pickers not us. And ironically with the passage
> of time and the disappearance of the real DRGW
> n.g. the obviously fake stacks have achieved some
> historic novelty acceptance, much like the bumble-
> bee paint job and the Grand Gold coaching stock.
> I'm glad I got some pix of the diamonds when I did,
> although I was less thrilled at the time.
Lunacy is in the eye of the beholder, John. Or the bumblebee holder . . .
Chris Walker Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The day ALCo hung that cross-compound on the
> front of the smokebox destroyed everything relating
> to the philosophy of aesthetics.
Just like slathering Marmite or Vegemite on a golden piece of toast destroys everything relating to the philosophy of ascetic taste.
Kelly Anderson Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The best comparison I've heard is that the dia-
> mond stacks are equivalent to trying to back-date
> a classic Mustang by hanging brass headlights
> and a brass radiator on it from a 1910 Model T.
AMEN, Kelly — and that applies to movie locos in general, not just the K-28s.
Dan Markoff Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Just in case anyone needs a reminder of what a
> large stack is supposed to look like and on what
> type of locomotive
. . . . here it is. OK it isn't a
> diamond . It's a Radley Hunter. But it is legit to
> the locomotive and the period
Beautiful photo of a beautiful locomotive!
TonyK375 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Rolling work of art!
Marowicz Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
. . . and one of the nicest looking stacks of all.
> But as you say, relevant to the locomotive and its
> period and would look pants on a K-28. Anyone
> for a spot of Photoshop to prove the point?
No need for PhotoShop, Mark — the Rio Grande did it for real, more or less, back in 1968. Here's a re-post of Ernie Robart's photo of #473 in her Hollyweird make-up for 'Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid':
Photo Copyright © 1968, 2008 by Ernest W. Robart - All Rights Reserved.
Jerry474 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I am one of the diamond stack haters and I echo
> the comments about trying to make a K28 look like
> an 1880 locomotive. I am not a fan of the cinder
> catchers currently used on the D&S. It was great
> to see 476 run a couple of days without one. But
> having seen a fire started by 473 just north of my
> home, I understand the need for them.
>
> When the K36 book is complete (soon) I will start
> on the K28 book. A D&S engineer asked me if I
> would include the diamond stacks in the book and
> I told him that I had to, it is part of the history
. . .
I know what you mean, Jerry -
Some of us got a lot of static for reproducing history – as best we could, anyway – back in 2010 when we got #489 repainted with a dark olive Moffat Green jacket to commemorate her trip over Poncha Pass back in 1950
:
And speaking of hideous movie make-up, we got a lot more static for repainting #487 as a stand-in for #483 as she appeared in 1970 when the first C&TS train arrived in Chama. Of course #489 – sans plow – would have been our first choice, but she was based at Cumbres that summer, on the far side of an impassable bridge
. . .
Photo Copyright © 1970, 2010 by Ernest W. Robart - All Rights Reserved.
Let us all now give thanks for the fact that both fake diamond stacks and hideous paint are easily removed!!
- El Abuelo Histœrico, Greengo y Curmudgeoño de los Locomoturas Viejos y Verdes,
aka Der Grossväterlich DünkelOlivGrünDampfKesselMantelLiebHabender
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 02/21/2018 11:20AM by Russo Loco.