Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: 487 is not under an extension

August 16, 2003 10:25PM
487 does not meet the new boiler codes. It is running under the old code, but not under extention. The way this fell was that boiler overhauls done the last year of the old code were entitled to run the full period under the old code, but would not be eligible for extention.
It must be one of the last, if not THE last locomotive running under an overhaul regulated by the old code.
Subject Author Posted

484?

SR Bush August 15, 2003 09:18PM

Re: 484?

Kevin Bush August 15, 2003 09:30PM

Re: 484?

Chile John Pritchard August 16, 2003 06:32AM

Re: 484?

Tom Kneib August 16, 2003 07:35AM

Re: 484?

Kevin Bush August 16, 2003 06:31PM

487 is not under an extension

Robby Peartree August 16, 2003 07:35PM

Re: 487 is not under an extension

Tom Kneib August 16, 2003 09:41PM

Re: 487 is not under an extension

Les Jarrett August 16, 2003 10:25PM

Re: 487 is not under an extension

Craig Kumler August 17, 2003 09:54AM

Don't have up-to-date info on the D&S *NM*

Les Jarrett August 17, 2003 10:32PM

Re: 487 is not under an extension

Robby Peartree August 17, 2003 09:26PM

So et me get this straight

Tom Kneib August 20, 2003 05:48AM

mumber of operating locomotives

Robby Peartree August 20, 2003 09:33AM

Nope *LINK*

John Kelly (K-36 487) August 17, 2003 06:36AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.