Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: 487 is not under an extension

Tom Kneib
August 16, 2003 09:41PM
Are you saying that 487 meets the new FRA codes and rules and can be run straight out of the shute next season.
Tom Kneib
____
|TK|__^ ^__I-
|463_______|
o O O O O o\
Subject Author Posted

484?

SR Bush August 15, 2003 09:18PM

Re: 484?

Kevin Bush August 15, 2003 09:30PM

Re: 484?

Chile John Pritchard August 16, 2003 06:32AM

Re: 484?

Tom Kneib August 16, 2003 07:35AM

Re: 484?

Kevin Bush August 16, 2003 06:31PM

487 is not under an extension

Robby Peartree August 16, 2003 07:35PM

Re: 487 is not under an extension

Tom Kneib August 16, 2003 09:41PM

Re: 487 is not under an extension

Les Jarrett August 16, 2003 10:25PM

Re: 487 is not under an extension

Craig Kumler August 17, 2003 09:54AM

Don't have up-to-date info on the D&S *NM*

Les Jarrett August 17, 2003 10:32PM

Re: 487 is not under an extension

Robby Peartree August 17, 2003 09:26PM

So et me get this straight

Tom Kneib August 20, 2003 05:48AM

mumber of operating locomotives

Robby Peartree August 20, 2003 09:33AM

Nope *LINK*

John Kelly (K-36 487) August 17, 2003 06:36AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.