Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Back to Peru, used US ng locomotives

February 23, 2017 08:09PM
Peru had a number of US built locomotives, but only a few purchased used…

C&S 75 & 76 were sold by Morse Bros to the Cerro De Pasco Copper Company (standard gauge) for use on the Huancayo and Huancavelica where they were appearengly Nos 9 & 10. (3’ gauge, converted to standard 1978.) Both were scrapped on the H&H long before conversion. This line was considered a branch of the FC de Central, a standard gauge line.

Sumpter Valley 2-8-2s 16, 17, & 18 were sold to the FC de Santa (previously the FC de Chimbote) The Santa has started to dieselize by in 1948 with 3 Porter center cabs. The line purchased Alco DL 535 locomotives in 1978. The Sumpter Valley engines were gone by the mid 1960’s

Sumpter Valley 4-6-0 No 50 became FC Santa Ana (the line between Cusco and Machu Pichu where it was No 100. It was scrapped in the early 1980’s

The odd duck was an “almost” Colorado locomotive… The FC Salaverry Y Trujillo locomotive No 1, Batta a 0-6-0 Porter, c/n 179, 4/1874, had been originally ordered by the Colorado Central, as their No 6. Porter specifications note that for Peru, the locomotive was fitted with an 8 wheel tender instead of the “tank on boiler” as ordered for Colorado.

Its not clear why the locomotive was redirected. The order for Peru was a rush order, for the 0-6-0 and a 2-4-0 built for the Carro & St Louis, and either repossessed or diverted. Porter records note that the locomotives were to ship in 10 days…

Eventually, the Colorado Central would place an order for a second No 6, c/n 276, in June 1877, for delivery in November 1877… the second No 6 was ordered as a tender engine. It was followed by No 7, c/n 281 within days. Given the 2 ½ years between c/n 179 and c/n 276 I suspect that things changed in Colorado, and that they canceled the order.

The confusion is carried into the published books on the Colorado Central, with Poor identifying No 6 correctly as c/n 276, while Hauck in Colorado Annual 10 says No 6 was c/n 179 with an 1873 date. The more recent book by Sundance follows Poor’s information (and says so). None note that there were two No 6’s ordered…

Randy Hees

Randy Hees

Director, Nevada State Railroad Museum, Boulder City, retired
PacificNG.org - a curated Wiki on Pacific Slope Narrow Gauge www.pacificng.com
Moderator - Railway Preservation News www.rypn.org
Subject Author Posted

Did C&S 76 miss the boat to Alaska? Attachments

bcp February 22, 2017 01:01AM

Re: Did C&S 76 miss the boat to Alaska?

nickgully February 22, 2017 12:15PM

Re: Did C&S 76 miss the boat to Alaska?

Brian Norden February 22, 2017 10:12PM

OT: The Aleutian Campaign

hank February 23, 2017 09:08AM

Re: OT: The Aleutian Campaign

dougvv February 23, 2017 10:27AM

Back to Peru, used US ng locomotives

Randy Hees February 23, 2017 08:09PM

Re: OT: The Aleutian Campaign

hank February 25, 2017 07:52AM

Re:MacArthur 282s to the WP&Y

m.j.peltier March 01, 2017 12:34AM

Re: Re:MacArthur 282s to the WP&Y

Popeye8762 March 01, 2017 06:42AM

Re: Did C&S 76 miss the boat to Alaska?

rrpreservation February 23, 2017 10:18AM

Re: Did C&S 76 miss the boat to Alaska?

DWB February 25, 2017 11:00PM

Re: Did C&S 76 miss the boat to Alaska?

bcp February 25, 2017 11:34PM

Re: Did C&S 76 miss the boat to Alaska?

weston1879 February 25, 2017 11:53PM

Re: Did C&S 76 miss the boat to Alaska?

CharlieMcCandless February 26, 2017 08:12AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login