Hi,
This seems to be an elegant theory that may never be provable or disprovable.
The information to prove or disprove this may have been lost or destroyed. So this is a still an elegant theory but not yet fact or a poor linking of evidence to try to prove something that never happened.
It is interesting that in mathematics there is a very elegant proof that shows that GIVEN A=B+C then A=B. it is a classic paradox and one I enjoyed in high school (1972). The basic oops was the division by the factor A-B-C to both sides of the equation. it took us in Advanced Mathematics a week to 10 days to solve the paradox. All the steps (some 10-12 of them IIRC) were valid Algebra. The last step was division by A-B-C.
Looking at the GIVEN A=B+C you can solve for zero (A-B-C=0). The last step was a hidden division by zero - division by zero is undefined.
I think you have almost proved your cased but the final step(s) are missing and might never be found to confirm or deny the theory.
This is railroad archeology and I hope you find evidence to finally prove or disprove the theory.
Doug vV
--------------------------
Carrie Fisher quotes:
Instant gratification takes too long.
I was street smart, but unfortunately the street was Rodeo Drive.
--------------------------
Luna Lovelace (Harry Potter):
I sleepwalk you know that's why I wear shoes to bed.