Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: 375 main rods...

May 04, 2016 01:48PM
I agree with Russ's point. As railroad technology evolved more and more the ability to make field adjustments was eliminated.
There was always a battle between the Mechanical Dept. and the Operating Dept.
Mechanical said that if Operating would leave things alone and show good judgement "things wouldn't break or get out of adjustment and everything would run fine from shopping to shopping".
Operating said that if Mechanical did their job right in the first place "the operating guys wouldn't have to adjust things to get over the road".
Of course there was a grain of truth in both positions. Remember that in the early days the engine crew had the responsibility to "get it over the road no matter what" The old books are full of hints on how to handle breakdowns.
As locomotives got larger it became impossible to keep parts that could be adjusted in adjustment due to the increase in mass and dynamic forces.
Forged end main and side rod bushings are a good example of this evolution.

I hope this helps explain the changes.

John Bush
Subject Author Posted

375 main rods...

Casey Akin May 02, 2016 11:32PM

Re: 375 main rods... Attachments

davegrandt May 03, 2016 09:17AM

Re: 375 main rods...

Chris Walker May 04, 2016 03:55AM

Re: 375 main rods...

cdaspit May 04, 2016 10:05AM

Re: 375 main rods...

Russ489 May 04, 2016 01:01PM

Re: 375 main rods...

John Bush May 04, 2016 01:48PM

Re: 375 main rods...

Earl May 04, 2016 03:04PM

Re: 375 main rods... Durango switcher, tender

cwallace May 10, 2016 01:46PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login