Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Killing the 483 deal

May 03, 2016 10:00AM
Popeye8762 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > The pleaders involved all kinds of tears of
> sorts
> > and the commission voted no at the last minute.
> A
> > number of Chama insiders were supposedly
> involved
> > including a Chama webmaster. I still wonder
> how
> > bad some the C&TS fans and friends really hate
> Al
> > Harper? One would think he could be a better
> ally
> > than enemy.
>
> I'm not aware of -any- ill will between the C&T
> and the D&S/Harper. I have breakfast with the
> webmaster several times a week, and he's not shy
> about heralding who he does and doesn't like.
> Their case was that there is, and should be, a
> sentimental attachment to the 483, being the first
> locomotive in service for the C&T. Our last swap
> wound up with a locomotive stuck semi-permanently
> in the roundhouse, and there was varied opinions
> whether a 470 could make the hill with a heavy
> train, requiring expensive double-heading.


Not everyone in Chama wanted to nix the trade. I was very much in favor of the trade. The trade would have been beneficial for both railroads. Very simply it was good business. 478 is in operation and 483 will likely never run again on the C&T. Secondly it would have added a level of missing history to the C&T. 470 series is a passenger locomotive. With the adding a level of missing history, that's the biggie imho. I commend the work by John Bush to get 168 and 478. It makes the C&T a true slice of narrow gauge history on various levels. Also, the Commission is asking the states for funding every year. They could have traded something in bad shape for something just needing a rebuild. There are others who will likely agree with this comment: If the swap had taken place, we could have easily had a 5 day flanger charter this past March with 478 on the C&T raising a good chunk of the money for it's rebuild prior to it's time out. And as well, sold a potential 478 flanger charter out quickly. The Commission imho was hookwinked by these individuals. A bunch of phoney excuses and sentiments similar to a 50 year old guy lamenting about his first car that's a pile of junk sitting in his backyard. Funny thing is I actually ran a needle scaler on 483 a few years ago. I did not see any of the individuals who screwed up the trade working on that locomotive during any of the recent Friend's work sessions. I expect to see all of these individuals in the Chama yard this summer working on 483. Reality is none of these folks will be in the Chama yard working on 483 and none have actually set a hand on 483 to help. If as much of their negativity was channeled into positive vibes, they'd have 483 in operation this summereye rolling smiley One person I respect has one word to describe what happened: unfortunate.

If things move around from the D&S, Loop, CRM and C&T to become operational and it helps all parties, it's good. It's highly counter productive for folks to sit behind the scenes and try and screw up hard work that's for the better benefit.

I have no doubt we could have done fund raising charters with 478 before it's timeout to raise money for it's rebuild.
Subject Author Posted

493 to the CRRM; to what end?

Jason Midyette April 29, 2016 11:06AM

Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

John West April 29, 2016 11:31AM

Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

C&Ssteamer April 29, 2016 11:47AM

Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

John Cole April 29, 2016 12:24PM

Polar Express backup?

John West April 29, 2016 12:38PM

Re: Polar Express backup?

trainrider47 April 29, 2016 12:48PM

Re: Polar Express backup?

Jim Callaway April 29, 2016 01:21PM

Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

C&Ssteamer April 29, 2016 02:23PM

Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

guymonmd April 29, 2016 12:43PM

Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

FrankJohnson April 29, 2016 01:10PM

Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

C&TS488fan April 29, 2016 01:12PM

Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

Tower Operator April 29, 2016 01:46PM

Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

cdaspit April 29, 2016 01:48PM

Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

rehunn April 29, 2016 02:06PM

Two different issues

John West April 29, 2016 02:25PM

Re: Two different issues

hsuthe April 29, 2016 02:58PM

Re: Two different issues

hsuthe April 29, 2016 02:58PM

Re: Two different issues Attachments

Stephen Peck April 29, 2016 03:03PM

Re: Two different issues

guymonmd April 29, 2016 04:11PM

Re: Two different issues

Fritz Klinke April 29, 2016 03:10PM

Re: Two different issues

rehunn April 29, 2016 03:34PM

Re: Two different issues

Johnson Barr April 29, 2016 07:41PM

Re: Two different issues

dougvv April 29, 2016 08:41PM

Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

MD Ramsey April 29, 2016 04:31PM

Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

michael April 29, 2016 04:48PM

Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

hsuthe April 29, 2016 05:04PM

Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

rdamurphy April 29, 2016 05:13PM

Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

Will Gant April 29, 2016 05:25PM

Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

C&Ssteamer April 29, 2016 06:02PM

Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

hsuthe April 29, 2016 06:29PM

Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

Dirk Ramsey April 29, 2016 09:02PM

Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

hsuthe April 30, 2016 06:15AM

Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

pd3463 April 30, 2016 06:36AM

Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

hsuthe April 30, 2016 08:54AM

Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

C&Ssteamer April 30, 2016 09:57AM

Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

dougvv April 30, 2016 10:56AM

Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

hsuthe April 30, 2016 02:59PM

Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

HogandTow May 01, 2016 07:37AM

Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

Popeye8762 May 01, 2016 03:44PM

Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

Jeff Taylor May 01, 2016 04:08PM

Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

Samart May 01, 2016 08:49PM

2-8-2 status - Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

dougvv May 01, 2016 09:42PM

Life in a fishbowl

74ford May 01, 2016 09:47PM

Re: Life in a fishbowl

Fritz Klinke May 01, 2016 11:00PM

Re: Life in a fishbowl

John West May 01, 2016 11:10PM

Re: Life in a fishbowl

Samart May 02, 2016 07:58AM

Re: Life in a fishbowl

John West May 02, 2016 08:10AM

Rumor mills...or rumor spills...

Samart May 02, 2016 08:36AM

Re: Life in a fishbowl

hsuthe May 02, 2016 06:08PM

Re: Life in a fishbowl

Samart May 02, 2016 06:34PM

Re: Life in a fishbowl

Tomstp May 02, 2016 08:28AM

Alternative to speculation

74ford May 02, 2016 08:50AM

Re: Alternative to speculation

dougvv May 02, 2016 09:21AM

Re: Alternative to speculation

rehunn May 02, 2016 09:57AM

Re: Alternative to speculation

John Cole May 02, 2016 10:56AM

Re: Alternative to speculation

HAICH OMANDIER May 02, 2016 12:06PM

Re: Alternative to speculation

Will Gant May 02, 2016 12:32PM

Re: Alternative to speculation

John Cole May 02, 2016 12:39PM

Re: Alternative to speculation

Fritz Klinke May 02, 2016 01:29PM

Re: Alternative to speculation

Jason Midyette May 02, 2016 01:25PM

Blunting the axes

John West May 02, 2016 01:54PM

Re: Blunting the axes

HAICH OMANDIER May 02, 2016 02:00PM

Re: Alternative to speculation

74ford May 02, 2016 08:14PM

Re: Killing the 483 deal

Jim Callaway May 02, 2016 11:42AM

Re: Killing the 483 deal

Popeye8762 May 03, 2016 06:55AM

Re: Killing the 483 deal

JoeK May 03, 2016 10:00AM

Re: Killing the 483 deal

hogger42 May 04, 2016 08:36AM

483

davidtltc May 04, 2016 09:27AM

Re: 483

John Cole May 04, 2016 10:34AM

Re: 483

JoeK May 04, 2016 10:58AM

Re: 483

davidtltc May 07, 2016 08:10PM

Re: Killing the 483 deal

JoeK May 04, 2016 11:08AM

Re: Killing the 483 deal

hogger42 May 05, 2016 05:41AM

Re: "Carpetbagger" helped kill 483 swap

Russo Loco May 06, 2016 06:37PM

Re: "Carpetbagger" helped kill 483 swap

Jim Callaway May 06, 2016 08:58PM

Re: "Carpetbagger" helped kill 483 swap

JoeK May 07, 2016 10:39AM

Re: "Carpetbagger" helped kill 483 swap

JoeK May 07, 2016 11:10AM

dreaming - Re: "Carpetbagger" helped kill 483 swap

dougvv May 07, 2016 04:21PM

Re: dreaming - Re: "Carpetbagger" helped kill 483 swap

Will Gant May 07, 2016 10:40PM

Re: Killing the 483 deal

hsuthe May 03, 2016 11:34AM

Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

C&Ssteamer May 02, 2016 11:36AM

Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

johnegert May 02, 2016 09:59PM

Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

trainrider47 May 03, 2016 02:52PM

Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

Russo Loco May 07, 2016 11:19AM

Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

HogandTow May 08, 2016 09:46AM

Re: 493 to the CRRM; to what end?

michael May 05, 2016 10:16AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login