Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: not the main rod

May 06, 2003 05:09PM
That was me sir!!
At the Omaha Zoo railroad, which is 30" gauge, we have two steam locomotives. One is a Crown 4-4-0 and the other is an Austrian Narrow Gauge 0-6-2t.
The Crown even though is no where near as powerful as the Austrian engine, and can only pull four cars up our grades (up to 6%) can bark pretty good. But the Austrian Engine can be very loud, and the whole locomotive is only about 25 feet long. It can easily walk 8 coaches up our grades.
I ran it a couple times the other day for the first time (im only 16) and my dads been running it on the weekends for more than 25 years. He told me alittle bit of what to do the first time, (mostly telling me what to do with the brakes because its 6% down grade sometimes too) but since I fire so much, I have a pretty dog gone good idea as what to do. I got to the point where I pretty comfortably could open it up alot on the 6% grade, and then slowly drop the gear as speed decreases. And it just gets louder and louder!! Very exciting little locomotive!!!
I have alot of cab footage inside the 463 on the C&TS as the lead engine of double headers and stuff. My dads got a real nice pair of head phones, and I just sit there with those things cranked way up and listen to my favorite cab sceen, and that is the 463, as the lead engine of a triple header, starting from a dead stop at Lobato trestle!!!
I hope I get to run the 463 when im an employee at the C&TS! I hope the railroad will even be in operation. I have to wait 3 years. Damnit
Kevin Bush
Subject Author Posted

The Mudhens - 100 years ago today

Matt Hutson April 30, 2003 03:45PM

And The Two Remaining Are Out Of Service *NM*

MudDuck April 30, 2003 04:13PM

Yes, That's a Bummer, BUT....

Herb Kelsey April 30, 2003 04:30PM

Re: Yes, That's a Bummer, BUT....

Marty Knox April 30, 2003 05:16PM

Re: Yes, That's a Bummer, BUT....

Herb Kelsey April 30, 2003 10:45PM

Re: Yes, That's a Bummer, BUT....

Herb Kelsey April 30, 2003 10:45PM

Superheater? Re: Yes, That's a Bummer, BUT....

Tom Stewart May 02, 2003 03:22PM

Re: Superheater? Re: Yes, That's a Bummer, BUT....

Marty Knox May 02, 2003 06:26PM

Re: Superheater? Re: Yes, That's a Bummer, BUT....

Jorge Gigante May 04, 2003 10:03AM

Re: The Mudhens - 100 years ago today

Kevin Bush May 01, 2003 03:02PM

New Main Rods--Opportunity in disguise *LINK*

Erik Ledbetter May 02, 2003 06:15AM

Re: New Main Rods--Opportunity in disguise

Kevin Bush May 02, 2003 03:47PM

Re: New Main Rods--Opportunity in disguise

Gavin Hamilton May 03, 2003 01:10PM

Re: not the main rod

John Craft May 02, 2003 08:04AM

Re: not the main rod

Kevin Bush May 02, 2003 03:40PM

Re: not the main rod

Gavin Hamilton May 03, 2003 01:08PM

Re: not the main rod

Trevor Hartford May 06, 2003 03:22PM

Re: not the main rod

Kevin Bush May 06, 2003 05:09PM

Re: The Mudhens - 100 years ago today

Jim Adams May 06, 2003 06:59PM

Re: The Mudhens - 100 years ago today

Kevin Bush May 06, 2003 07:36PM

Re: The Mudhens - 100 years ago today

Jim Adams May 06, 2003 09:42PM

Re: The Mudhens - 100 years ago today

Kevin Bush May 07, 2003 06:12AM

Re: The Mudhens - 100 years ago today

Jim Adams May 07, 2003 08:36AM

Re: The Mudhens - 100 years ago today

Kevin Bush May 08, 2003 07:16AM

Re: The Mudhens - 100 years ago today

Jim Adams May 08, 2003 08:34AM

Re: The Mudhens - 100 years ago today

Glenn Butcher May 09, 2003 12:29AM

Re: The Mudhens - 100 years ago today

Kevin Bush May 09, 2003 05:45AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.