Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: WP&Y 69 Another view

Anonymous User
July 04, 2007 11:02AM
Several errors are contained in a few of these posts and need to be clarified. First, the white pass made no decisions as to what or how the work would be done... Second, Robert Franzen led the move and rebuild of 1744. Third, running a locomotive when it is not in the best interest of the equipment or the safety of the public is something that any number of people do but is not something that one would put on their resume.(ala georgetown)
Just want to keep the facts straight folks.

By the way Phil, I would say that replaceing a smokebox because of the previously mentioned work that was performed in a manner completely contradicting standard practice is not what I would call "getting their hands on it" Nor burnt up rod bearings, turning grooved-pitted and tapered journals,turning tapered crank pins, etc. That sounds to me as though it is required work to even get on track towards having a good piece of machinery.
Did I possibly misunderstand your post if so I apologize.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07/04/2007 04:48PM by rogerdelafield.
Subject Author Posted

WP&Y 69 Another view Attachments

Dick Bell June 17, 2007 02:39PM

Re: WP&Y 69 Another view Attachments

Dick Bell June 17, 2007 02:40PM

Re: WP&Y 69 Another view Attachments

Dick Bell June 17, 2007 02:40PM

Re: WP&Y 69 Another view

Frederick G. Bailey June 18, 2007 03:40PM

Re: WP&Y 69 Another view

Fred T June 18, 2007 05:25PM

Re: WP&Y 69 Another view

Paul Dalleska June 18, 2007 05:53PM

Re: WP&Y 69 Another view

Anonymous User July 03, 2007 05:51PM

Re: WP&Y 69 Another view

Frederick G. Bailey July 03, 2007 07:05PM

Re: WP&Y 69 Another view

Ryan Shofner July 04, 2007 01:31AM

I agree

El Coke July 04, 2007 07:15AM

Re: I agree

PhilJ July 04, 2007 08:46AM

Re: WP&Y 69 Another view

Anonymous User July 04, 2007 11:02AM

Re: WP&Y 69 Another view

Earl July 04, 2007 08:12PM

Re: WP&Y 69 Another view

Anonymous User July 06, 2007 09:43PM

Re: WP&Y 69 Another view

Loco112 July 06, 2007 10:33PM

Jason Sobczynski Is "rogerdelafield"

Anonymous User July 06, 2007 10:46PM

Jason Sobczynski Is NOT "rogerdelafield"

Don Richter July 10, 2007 01:09PM

Re: WP&Y 69 Another view

Mike Spera July 07, 2007 12:50AM

Smokebox attachment

Marty Knox July 07, 2007 12:20PM

Re: WP&Y 69 Another view

Loco112 July 07, 2007 01:36PM

who are you ?

Jack Campbell July 07, 2007 03:58PM

Re: who are you ?

Don Richter July 07, 2007 04:22PM

Re: who are you ?

Curtis_F July 07, 2007 05:42PM

Re: who are you ?

Don Richter July 07, 2007 05:57PM

Re: who are you ? ...oops

Curtis_F July 07, 2007 06:01PM

Re: who are you ? ...oops

Don Richter July 07, 2007 06:19PM

Re: who are you ?

PhilJ July 07, 2007 04:47PM

Re: WP&Y 69 Another view

Tim Schreiner July 07, 2007 04:55PM

Thank you Mike

J Thain July 07, 2007 09:55AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.